this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
46 points (78.0% liked)

Technology

86354 readers
3572 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

SpaceX conducted another successful Starship launch test yesterday evening.

You can watch the full, 1:40:00 footage here:

Invidious YouTube

I'd recommend watching it, it's a well-done video documentary, not too long, with good views.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

One vacuum engine went out on starship but the 3 sea level engines gimbaled to compensate and continue on to released all 22 starlink simulators, then land vertical in the ocean as if at the tower.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also, they had to 'glide' in upper atmosphere for additional ~60s to hit the landing zone. I think they almost ran out of fuel due to engine failure

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah they also lost a sea level raptor on the booster towards the end of the accent. That's honestly not a big deal, losing 1/28 engines at a point in the flight when they're already probably throttling down a bunch.

But still, they've got some kinks to work out with the raptor 3.

That said, did you see how much faster it left the launch pad? They've seriously increased the thrust with these new raptors.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Scott Manley made video about this. Turns out with raptor 2 they were slow starting on purpose, while now they went full throttle immediately.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yep, it looks like that new much larger downcomer may really be the thing to thank, now they can actually feed all those engines fast enough.

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It blew an engine and crashed into the sea.

That’s honestly not a big deal,

Fucking Jesus.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

These idiots are yelping and cheering in the background while rockets burn billions of taxpayer dollars.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well it did a simulated landing in the sea. (And then exploded)

We know that was the plan all along and that it landed on target because there was a camera buoy sitting in the ocean waiting to record the landing. Which it did.

Yeah they blew an engine, but that's kinda what redundancy is all about.

Do you know how many times the Saturn V had to make early shutdowns on one of its engines? It's easier to say how many times it didn't have early shutdowns: 0. On every single launch they had to shut off at least 1 engine early as the combustion became unstable; this is just part of the game.

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

yeah it was outright visible that the documentary was especially well-done because a potential IPO

[–] pipe01@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fuck anyone that supports that pedo

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i'm not a fan of musk at all; however this is in the technology community because it's a good technological breakthrough.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

And, it shouldn't need to be said, Elon Musk has exactly zero to do with this other than paying.

This is a conversation between engineers and physics.

[–] msage@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

Paying? Like Musk is paying for anything lol.

Taxpayers have paid for this.

He is just a punchable face.

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exactly zero except he's the owner and supporting spaceX directly contributes to his bank account.

No thanks

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Supporting SpaceX financially contributes to his bank account, posting on social media does nothing.

The engineers that did this are great, I don't care about Elon Musk... I'll choose a different space company to launch my satellites.

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That ignored my comment entirely. But even if you don't pay him through satellites, hyping this failure still contributes to his bank account.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

I hope the world can survive the $0.38 worth of advertising that my comment adds to his trillion dollar bank account.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Elon Musk is not paying, the US taxpayer is paying.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

That doesn't change the point that the people who designed, built and operated the spacecraft in question here are the ones who own the accomplishment, regardless of ownership or funding.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

On the side note, it looked like their heat shield performed better than ever. Not only it shown low damage during splashdown, it also was exposed to heating in upper atmosphere for around minute more than normal due to course correction

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

another successful starship launch

Lol, that would imply that they're has been any successful launch before