this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
592 points (99.3% liked)

196

6290 readers
1526 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

This is funny because as a teenager the main argument for why I (amab) was allowed to get the hpv vaccine was to prevent risk to any potential afab partners. These days we know that hpv causes all sorts of cancers in anyone with any functional anatomy (if someone has neither a throat nor genitals I'm very sorry for their situation, but they're an extreme outlier).

The ubiquity of HPV reminds me of the ubiquity of chickenpox. Neither was immediately fatal and most people got them so a lot of people didn't get that these were very bad diseases that needed to be actively controlled. I stand by my disgust at the parents who refused their daughters the hpv vaccine on the grounds of sexual purity. I don't have kids, but I can't imagine not giving my child a vaccine that can prevent cancer, no matter how much I disapprove of the actions they'd have to take for them to get that kind of cancer.

~€90? Damn, I paid €600 for mine and I'm an at risk group.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

87 is not nothing??? Like what...

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd respond gay for €87. I mean, I would respond that way anyways, but if I was straight I would too!

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except there is now a legal record of you saying you're gay. That or you comitted fraud. And that paper gets handed to whoever is bearing the cost. Likely a government agency. Meaning the government keeps records of gay people. I would think twice about paying or not, regardless of me being gay or not.

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

He's on his way to the camps soon lmao

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's "nothing much" if the alternative is the risk of all the issues you can get from HPV.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know people that wouldn't be able to afford it. You get that the consequnce to paywalled healthcare is having sick people and not people just sucking it up and paying? The real alternative is of course allegedly already spelled out by Mr. Mangione but maybe a refresher is due?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I mean it's free if you're under 18, at least in my country. If you decide to get it as an adult, the government has decided that they don't really give a fuck because you probably already have at least one of the HPV strains they're trying to vaccinate for, and it's just not worth it to the taxpayer to vaccinate you anymore.

The thing about public healthcare is that you try to get maximum benefit for the public, with the resources you have available. Resources are not infinite, so not all treatments or vaccines can be free for everyone. They're still available and generally cheaper than in some place like the US.

If someone wants to Mangione the social minister of my country, that's not likely to improve the situation, she was a doctor for a decade and a half before getting into politics and was one of the sane voices during the COVID pandemic telling people to try vaccines and social distancing instead of whatever the ivermectin and bleach equivalents were here. She already got death threats for it, even delivered to her home.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you decide to get it as an adult ... it's just not worth it to the taxpayer to vaccinate you anymore.

nah this pitting of the individual against the collective has got to stop. The person that needs the vaccine deserves treatment, regardless of their ability to pay taxes. It's not "the society" they're taking away from, they're a part of society. It's society taking care of itself.

Also who "decides" to get HPV?? Framing illness as a personal failing is really awful

The thing about public healthcare is that you try to get maximum benefit for the public, with the resources you have available.

I do not believe that in any country using €'s that the issue is resource scarcity.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

nah this pitting of the individual against the collective has got to stop. The person that needs the vaccine deserves treatment, regardless of their ability to pay taxes.

Huh? Any person who has to pay for the vaccine here DOES pay taxes. The people getting the vaccine for free do not. You have to be under 18 to get it for free.

It’s not “the society” they’re taking away from, they’re a part of society.

And the health board has decided that vaccinating an adult for HPV doesn't have the same net benefit to society as vaccinating a young person, so it's more efficient to spend the money elsewhere.

Also who “decides” to get HPV?? Framing illness as a personal failing is really awful

Who said anything about anyone deciding to get HPV?

I do not believe that in any country using €'s that the issue is resource scarcity.

Some countries try not to borrow their budget into oblivion and thus not everything gets treated or vaccinated for free, free university education has limits per subject per year, etc.

[–] rnkn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Resources are not infinite

Yes they are. The government can print money for a healthcare system just as easily as it does for banks.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You're American, aren't you?

My government can't just print more money, it can sell bonds. It then has to pay interest on those AND pay back the principal too. Most of the government's money comes from taxes.

The EU can print more money, but we are not in control of that.

We also don't manufacture vaccines and medicine, we have to buy them from other countries. So they don't exactly appear out of thin air either.

But I guess if you're American, it's easy to see resources as unlimited because your country's been plundering the rest of the world.

[–] rnkn@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)
  1. Countries using the € can't actually print money, only the European Central Bank can. So for any individual country, MMT doesn't apply, it's still mainstream economics as per the table in the article you linked. When we have a budget shortfall in Estonia, we sell bonds, cut costs or raise taxes. And our taxes are pretty fucking high already.

  2. If you're a smaller nation with its own currency, i.e not the US or China and not part of the EU bloc, printing more currency just means it's worth less in other currencies and since you have to buy things (such as, again, vaccines and medicine) from other countries, you end up losing in purchasing power and you'll still have to decide what to buy and what not to buy. This is the "MMT in practice" section in your article where it mentions high inflation for pretty much all the countries that tried it, which are basically all latam countries. For SOME reason, no developed countries outside of the US do this at any scale, perhaps because nobody else's currency can take infinite printing without being devalued to fuck all.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No I'm not, I'm german. Which is the same diff in the context of the EU I get that. But I'd still maintain that the issue is likely the coddling of rich people and letting them spend the countries resources and laborpower how they wish instead of an actual shortage of vaccines.

Or tell me that it's all germany's fault, that's usually true as well.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Average salary in Germany is like 2x what it is here, of course your government can or should be able to afford a lot more than ours, purely based on the available tax base

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 126 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A pal and I went to join a newly opened gym.

I says to the dude on the desk: "How much is the membership a month?"

The staff member says: "It's £50 per month each, or £75 for a couple"

I'm motioning my pal over, and I'm like "dude are we like boyfriends now?"

"yeah"

Turns back to the dude on the desk: "we'll take the couple's membership please".

Went cross code to save £12.50 a month each. Worth it.

[–] eli@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Holy shit, £50 a month? Is that a common/standard rate?

At my work we have access to a $25 USD a month membership and I think that is even a bit too expensive for my taste...

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

hahaha I pay $75 a month for my gym, and it's the cheapest in town.

Prices are just different based upon what cost of living is where you live. That $25 sounds like a pretty good deal depending on whether or not it has a pool though.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

My local climbing gym is $70/mo
That's why i don't climb

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

any gym membership has to compete with the cost of one of those door-frame pullup bars and some weights

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wanted to build a home gym too, but when you add the squat rack (realistically a two post one, not the proper big cage) and some sort of bench, it starts getting pretty expensive.

Gyms vary in price a lot though. From like 19€ a month to like 70 or so I think. I asked someone if the expensive gym is less crowded, but apparently not. Problem is, everyone already knows about them, they've been around for much longer than the cheap gyms (of which one has been around for a decade or so)

[–] nevetsg@aussie.zone 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Online marketplace's. People are always giving used home gym gear away for next to nothing.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 21 hours ago

Ugh I try to avoid Facebook and realistically that's the only marketplace worth a damn these days. Perhaps I should tell my friends who still use it to keep their eyes open.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I have a treadmill, squat rack, pull up bar, Olympic barbell and weights, protective flooring, A/C unit, sundry accessories (gloves, whiteboard, skipping rope). Probably about 2-3 grand.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 20 hours ago

Gym memberships are a tax-free benefit where I come from so I can just pay for it from the company bank account and not pay any taxes, making it almost 50% cheaper than paying out the same amount in salary to myself. Meaning the 250€ annual membership is realistically more like 130€ in "real" (post-tax) money. If you don't do things through your own company, though, most employers pay a health/fitness benefit, often at the maximum allowed amount, which is 400€ a year. Usually it's paid through a system where you can only spend it on eligible tax-free services, like a gym membership, massage, going swimming, etc.

Gym equipment, however, is unfortunately never a tax-free benefit and is instead considered a fringe benefit. Quite literally considered as part of an employee's income and taxed as such. So if I spent, say, 2k on equipment, that's the same as 15 years of gym membership at the current rate (which is already high for me because I live outside of the bigger cities that have the cheap gyms). Funnily enough, maintenance of a company's existing in-house gym is eligible for the aforementioned tax-free benefit, just buying new equipment isn't.

Used equipment makes a large dent in the price, but if going for brand new, it takes so long to pay off, it's rarely worth it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I pay just under $20 per week in Australia. That's on a special promo price because I signed up in the weeks before the gym opened. (That's under $15 USD at today's exchange rate, but still...)

[–] eli@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I guess I've just been living under a rock...

[–] Battle_Masker@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I ain't gay, but 87 euros sure is a lot for a just one shot

I paid €600 for the 3 shots.

[–] vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 days ago

And that’s just for one disease! There’s like thousands of the things!

[–] scops@reddthat.com 10 points 2 days ago

The HPV vaccine I received was three doses over a nine month period, so I guess we're talking 29 euros a shot, or 261 for the course, depending

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is funny but I want to remind people not to discuss the STI diagnosis of your brother’s girlfriend. On twitter.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

I can't decide if that was likely part of the joke vs a genuine flub

[–] AudaciousArmadillo@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Almost everyone has HPV and for most people (especially cis men) its harmless. But if you are young, please get the shot to protect the uteruses in your life.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 days ago

AFAIK it can still cause cancer no matter who you are, that's why i jumped on the offer for a free vaccine.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They only vaccinate 9-18 year olds here now, with main focus being <14 I believe (of both genders). I could get a shot myself, but it's like 200€. And I'm not that young anymore, I probably have some form of HPV, though I could also check to see if my recent test included it.

I swear they used to vaccinate men under 26 or 27 and all women at some point. I think I was a year above the limit back then, but I could be wrong

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You can do expensive PCR tests for it but otherwise no, detection comes from tissue samples in the infected area.

I also think the way they disregard it if you're older is dumb.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Hella dumb. Due to reasons I'm pretty sure that I'm more likely to not have it than the average 16yo. I'd even pay for it myself if it wasn't like 500€.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

As someone with a recent infection, I'd say that it's worth the 500 tbh

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

I'd probably go for it if I wasn't extremely poor and TBH at a very low risk of contracting it in the near future.

[–] urheber@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

I want HPV for free hysterectomy please

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One might argue that dating a person with HPV puts you at risk as well. one might

load more comments (1 replies)

Probably just saw the € as a weird cent symbol

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Gay for not pay

[–] Fleppensteijn@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bullshit. One dose costs €165 and you need 2 to 3 shots.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 11 points 2 days ago

What an amazing comment chain lol

load more comments
view more: next ›