this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
724 points (98.4% liked)

Selfhosted

56958 readers
1271 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey everyone,

We've built an open-source, privacy-preserving alternative to Ring cameras using a Raspberry Pi Zero 2W (called Secluso). It uses end-to-end encryption to send videos from the camera to a mobile app, which is available both in Google Play Store and Apple App Store. We also support Obtainium for people that do not wish to use Google Play.

We've put in a lot of effort to make it easy to set up! You can set up our camera on your own Pi in less than 5 minutes with minimal technical expertise using our easy-to-use GUI deploy tool. Here are our setup guide and open source release.

The image shows a Pi in an official Raspberry Pi enclosure that you can use for your camera. We've also been working on a HAT for the Pi to add night vision, audio, temperature monitoring for safety, all in a compact form factor. You can see the HAT and an enclosure for the whole camera in the photo.

We've been working on this for almost 2 years now, and we look forward to we look forward to seeing what you all think!

(page 3) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 3 points 23 hours ago
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

How does it scale? Can I do 50 cameras?

Can I do 20 users with granular permissions?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

Exited to see more! Keep up the good work!

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What temp ranges are these good for? Can it run off solar+battery?

How are you protecting against supply chain attacks?

[–] jkaczman@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hi Brkdncr, thanks for the question!

We honestly do not have a concrete answer for the temp ranges. We've done some testing and made sure they stay under 150F in the 3D case shown in the picture.

We do not currently directly support solar/battery usage. You can probably DIY something together though!

For Software: We've started to thoroughly go through our dependencies by using the Cargo Vet tool, in addition to looking for unmaintained dependencies, dependencies that we can replace with a few lines of code, etc.

For Hardware: We're using trusted hardware providers like Raspberry Pi to try to mitigate this.

Let me know if you have any other questions!

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Cargo is a red flag. It doesn't verify any cryptographic signatures of what it downloads, unlike apt and maven.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] David@social.bazurk.wtf 2 points 1 day ago

@jkaczman

This intrigues me.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm sorry, but it's a pretty big oversight to push the security aspect so hard that you don't say a single thing about the actual camera. Nothing on the functionality, specs, etc...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Snowhuoue@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago (34 children)

Just out of curiosity, why?

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This isn't the first project like this, motionEye OS has been around for years.

[–] jkaczman@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Thanks for the reply! Based on what I know about motionEyeOS, I would say the projects have different goals.

From MotionEyeOS's website: "Get instant email notifications when motion is detected.", "Save recordings to cloud services, network drives, or local storage. Automatic backup and archiving options."

We differ because we specifically made this to not compromise on functionality. We offer push notifications, easy private access via our mobile app, and the cloud relay cannot decrypt videos.(whereas it seems if you were to use the cloud with MotionEyeOS, they would not be encrypted).

While you could go local in MotionEyeOS to avoid that, it would be more inconvenient for most people, and we wanted something that could be a non-feature-compromising private replacement to modern cameras that's simple to setup and easy to use.

[–] Snowhuoue@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, I’ve used motionEye OS before. It was quite good, although a little bit choppy in video quality, and lacking the push notifications to make it useful to me (or at least that was the conclusion that I came to at the time, which may or may not have been correct!)

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago

I don’t mean the topic, I mean the project itself.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›