this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
721 points (98.5% liked)

Selfhosted

56958 readers
1762 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey everyone,

We've built an open-source, privacy-preserving alternative to Ring cameras using a Raspberry Pi Zero 2W (called Secluso). It uses end-to-end encryption to send videos from the camera to a mobile app, which is available both in Google Play Store and Apple App Store. We also support Obtainium for people that do not wish to use Google Play.

We've put in a lot of effort to make it easy to set up! You can set up our camera on your own Pi in less than 5 minutes with minimal technical expertise using our easy-to-use GUI deploy tool. Here are our setup guide and open source release.

The image shows a Pi in an official Raspberry Pi enclosure that you can use for your camera. We've also been working on a HAT for the Pi to add night vision, audio, temperature monitoring for safety, all in a compact form factor. You can see the HAT and an enclosure for the whole camera in the photo.

We've been working on this for almost 2 years now, and we look forward to we look forward to seeing what you all think!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago

Very nice. I'm desperately trying to get rid of my Ring cameras. This looks like a viable option.

[–] Ascend910@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

okay this is actually a cool project to work on

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 hours ago

Ideally the thing should be broken into a "Camera captures images and makes it available in an open format" side and an "Application for Linux/Windows/Mac/iOS/Android/whatever reads said open format data and shows it to the use/records it in local hardware", so that if one's chosen provider for one of the sides enshittifies you can easily replace it, but I can understand the tendency to make and launch the whole thing fully integrated as one non-interoperable big bundle from a single provider given that in practice "do it and they'll come" projects that just provide data in an open format in the expectation that other people will make the software that uses it, almost always fail.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 7 points 7 hours ago

Amazing work guys! Looks very promising. If I needed cameras I would use this.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

But does it do frigate? Can it be used applessly?

[–] jkaczman@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Hi muusemuuse, this is meant to be a drop-in replacement to WiFi cameras (and therefore accessible to non-technical users, easy to use and easy to setup). Frigate is great, and we definitely recommend it if you have the time to get it up and running.

In regard to being able to use it without the app, that's not possible unfortunately due to the end-to-end encryption that takes place. An application needs to be on the other end to decrypt things.

Our app is available through Obtainium if you do not like the Play Store. It is also reproducible, so you can verify to make sure it was derived from our mobile_client codebase.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Are only VPS relay's supported at the moment? Presumably so the feed is accessible over the web?

I get that the project seems to be going for replicating a ring/wyze/etc style experience but being able to self-host a relay somehow seems like a logical addition. Would probably have to disavow connecting outside of the home network and leave that the responsibility of the user.

[–] jkaczman@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

If you're technical, you could probably put together a locally hosted server on your Linux machine and use Tailscale or something like that, it should work fine with the code as-is. Our server binary is in the runtime-binaries zip in the core GitHub release.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I think the point is to be easier than frigate. Eg a full image like home assistant, not needing to fiddle with docker.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Podman quadlets or I’m out

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I will keep pushing for my alternative : buy some out-of-order cameras and stick them in highly visible places.

0 maintenance, 0 infrastructure, 100% of the deterring effect working cameras would have had.

[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That works well enough to deter thieves from stealing your packages. But not so useful when you wake up to find a hit and run driver clipped your parked car over night.

[–] arcine@jlai.lu -1 points 3 hours ago

Eh ! If the car still works, who cares ? Besides, if you can afford security cameras and a house, you probably have a garage. Use it.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Yeah. Your can even but replica cameras with leds for like 10 bucks

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

This is interesting. Can you give me a ballpark on your hardware cost for an 8 camera system? What does integration for NAS look like?

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You can also flash a Wyze Doorbell v1 with Thingino

https://github.com/themactep/thingino-firmware/wiki/Camera:-Wyze-Doorbell-%28V1%29

Lots of ways self hosting ways of doing bidirectional rtsp doorbell.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Any good open-source nvrs that support bidirectional rtsp? I know zoneminder didn't last time I checked.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 5 hours ago

I've done a thing with Kamailio and Baresip and MQTT and Linphone on my phone so when someone presses the door bell button, I get a video SIP call from "doorbell". But other I think are doing things with HomeAssistant, go2rtc and Frigate. I just didn't like it so went my own way. Would love to have done my own Signal client that wrapped RTSP, but it wouldn't be allowed on the Signal network, but Linphone is ok. Video SIP is standard at least.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Frigate has support for bidir audio

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

But it requires SSL to work, and WiFi cameras are not the greatest option for that kind of bandwidth.

I know, I tried it. It never worked right.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

oh, didn't know what tech it uses for that. that's sad

[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 307 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (9 children)

These comments are why privacy products will always be behind. Why open-source is full of dead projects. These people are just trying to make a living off making privacy-focused products. And all the comments are like "They're a for-profit company? They had marketing material prepped to reply to people's comments?!".

The code is open-source, self-hostable, built using commodity hardware (raspi), and they're just trying to make it sustainable by providing an optional paid service. This is not the enemy.

[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 33 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

No good deed goes unpunished. The sense of self entitlement some people display is staggering. FOSS project? Well, you should have done x y or z.

Also, I gave you $3 via Ko-fi, so you need to provide customer support in perpetuity and come to my house and install it. And heaven forbid you try to recoup costs!

Projects don't just die out - a lot of them are killed (one way or another). For example, I had a fully specced out FPGA design that would capture the signal from Wii GPU and do internal upscaled resolution (think: like what dolphin emulator does but with actual hardware) not just post process sharpening. Total cost under $100 and some know how.

The amount of flack I copped for it made me shut down the github and work on it for myself. Once it's perfected, I may post about it again but I sure as shit am not compelled to deal with the fucking peanut gallery anymore.

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I used to think Reddit users were too negative. Then I joined Lemmy.

[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 hours ago

Loud people are negative. Doesn't matter the website.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 103 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah, free, open source is fun, but we should also just support companies that have good ethics and want to make enough money to earn a living and keep making good products that respect people.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Nice! I've been wondering lately if there was an open-source solution for this

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

iirc pine64 so has a camera in their store

[–] jkaczman@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

Yes they do! Theirs is an IP camera.

load more comments
view more: next ›