this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
16 points (86.4% liked)

Fuck AI

7069 readers
2407 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Examine a GH user's profile, to help quickly decide how much to invest in their contributions. - ehmatthes/gh-profiler

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago

So... Algorithmic profiling?

Not exactly loving the sound of that.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Stay your pitchforks kids, this is just a logical response to a problem we all have. It may not be perfect (and lacks transparency), but so far it's the best idea I've heard to solving the problem of what is effectively spam in the FOSS community.

It doesn't seem unreasonable to me that a project should be able to vet would-be contributors based on a variety of metrics. We do this with spam blockers in email all the time and while imperfect, is better than leaving email unusable.

The risk of false-positives though is definitely something to think about. Someone shouldn't be blocked from submitting a PR just because their account is new, but a system which combines a series of metrics:

  • account age
  • size of PR
  • number of similar PRs in the wild and the size of those PRs
  • accept/reject ratio
  • any other sort of reputational flags that might make sense

...into a calculable score (as this one appears to do, again: better docs, more transparency please) could be quite valuable.

My main complaint is that it's on GitHub. Can we all just get the fuck off that dumpsterfire already?

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not a single mention in the README of how the profiling works and what signals it responds to.

This is likely to just exclude new contributors and damage the pipeline for beginner programmers to get mentored and become contributors.

If what you really want is to shut out AI contributions then there must be much more inclusive and human ways to do this.

[–] knuk@piefed.ca 4 points 5 days ago

I looked at the code and noticed it'll red/yellow flag you depending on how much personal info you made public on your github account, 0 being red flag and >3 yellow flag.

It's not the only factor but it tells me it's not worth much as a tool, not everyone likes to make their info public while spammers can easily fake it.