this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
269 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

85142 readers
5147 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

• YouTube is making it easier than ever to spot AI-generated videos.

• The company is rolling out new labels for both long-form videos and Shorts that make it clear which videos were produced using AI.

• YouTube is also rolling out a new automatic detection system to spot AI videos even if a creator doesn't make a disclosure.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

How about a dislike button? Maybe even a rating system where you can vote how good a video was on a range?

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

The dislike button never went anywhere. Do you mean the dislike counter?

[–] sureshot0@discuss.online 2 points 5 days ago

When youtube had a dislike button, it was abused by people raiding each other's channels over personal disagreements. :( I think that's why they removed it.

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 1 points 6 days ago

Wait, you mean Dr. Feynman didn't speak extensively on the healing power of crystals? /s It's really super-duper-cool that we've created a system of zero platform accountability.

[–] Pickleideas@lemmy.world 109 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also they need to ban Ai videos from YT Kids

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or just ban them all together

[–] Smeagol666@crazypeople.online 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or at least make the fucking "thumbs down" mean something.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same goes for "do not recommend channel" and "not interested"

[–] Smeagol666@crazypeople.online 3 points 1 week ago

Absolutely!

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

will someone please think of the retention numbers

a measure that will actually help protecting kids? Not on their watch

[–] iceberg314@slrpnk.net 88 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I actually support this as long as the false positives are not too bad

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 34 points 1 week ago

I don't think Youtube's history on false positives for things is all that stellar. Maybe if they get AI to help it will... oh, no, it will make it far worse than even Youtube can do alone.

[–] Jomega@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Good luck with that. YouTube content moderation is notoriously automated.

[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The problem is most humans are horrible at it. youll see 10 year old videos reposted and people scream AI!!!

btw: my new mission is to not refer to anything as ai. its a bad blanket statement. so video generators or llms.

[–] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Let us filter out the AI videos cowards

[–] tahoe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It kind of does it by itself if you use the algorithm correctly, I was seeing some AI slop in my shorts like a year ago but after having disliked it/reported it, it seems to have gone away. I haven’t seen a single AI video in many months

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

That's a trial and error approach for something that could easily be a simple setting.

It also doesn't work if you use an alternative front end or aren't signed in.

Additionally it also depends entirely on the content you view and your viewing enough of it to train the algorithm, which means new accounts or little used accounts have no recourse.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Same. I never see AI slop. Or politics. My algorithm is dialed in and my recommended is all bangers.

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's plenty of long form AI content lately too. Wikipedia articles make for great YouTube videos, and there's no shortage of them. I've run into several channels lately where it took me about 30 seconds to realize something was off, and checking the channel's history you can usually tell by finding older videos which actually have a person in them who is clearly very different than the narrator in the newer videos, or by just not having any older videos at all.

[–] tahoe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I’ve ran into those too 🥲

What kills me is all the comments completely oblivious to the situation

[–] moktor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Every single AI short video that shows up I thumbs down and tell me never to show me that channel again. Doesn't stop like 85% of my feed from being essentially the same AI short videos by users with names like agagin9927385, liafu63836662, or crazyvideos445442..I spend more times thumbs downing and saying never to show this again than I do watching the videos.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

I'd be all for YouTubeAI.com with only AI content there, then I can stop blocking that 1 asian dude with 500000 channels

[–] remon@ani.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If they're adding a label you can just use that label to block them with ublock.

[–] Wooki@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

This. For the love of God, this!!

[–] tengkuizdihar@programming.dev 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

how about FILTERING if it has AI content in it? Like, I don't want porn/risque content on my search, means they have the mean to tag videos and filter it.

How about filtering slop too?

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I report those. I hope the automated systems just takes those channels down.

[–] ChromaticMan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I hate AI videos as much as the next person, but why would YouTube take those down. As far as I know they aren’t against any guidelines.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

There is a rule against low-quality or low-effort content which I believe is machine-generated content falls under.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 23 points 1 week ago
[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You mean the YouTube that dumps out AI summaries of the videos you're on their platform specifically to watch directly? That YouTube?

Surely they aren't a company composed of two-faced slimeballs like their parent. That would be unheard of.

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Obligatory "fuck AI," however I've reluctantly found that the AI summaries can be helpful on occasion, such as when deciding if a video with a clickbaity title is actually worth watching, or when I'm on YouTube looking for a solution to a problem (in which case the summary can sometimes get me the content way faster than watching the video). So of all the dumb shit YouTube has done to their platform in recent years, I'd argue the AI summaries fall on the "actually not that bad" end of the spectrum.

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

That's very fair, it's definitely in the vein of what LLMs are (theoretically) meant for, i.e. summarization and language parsing/analysis. I find that LLMs work pretty well for translation too. It's just a shame that executives have run it to the ground like they usually do. And the people poisoning us are the same ones treating it in this case.

[–] Bitflip@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds good now. Sounds like an excuse to 'accidentally' flag videos they don't want getting clicks in the future.

That's the Google YouTube way!

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I still want to be able to block channels. A setting to filter out channels that are AI or just filter videos they use AI would be great but even then why can't I block channels?

[–] Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You sort of can, on the desktop site when watching a video on the right hand side there are a bunch of recommendations. Next to each recommendation is three dots. Click on the dots, then you should get a dropdown with the option to never recommend that channel again. I do this fairly liberally and mostly don't get AI vids recommended anymore

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

It's still a problem when searching though.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Click the 3-dots on a thumbnail and click "Don't recommend channel."

Or use PeerTube.

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't get that. It's available on shorts only. On videos I get "Not Interested".

Edit: It is available for me but only on some videos, and it's hit or miss on mobile. In the browser (like another person said) it does work, so I suppose that's something.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I guess "Don't recommend channel" is only available on the Recommendations thumbnails along the side when a video is playing.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I quit watching YouTube, problem solved.

[–] sureshot0@discuss.online 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Have you stopped watching videos, or did you move to another platform? I sometimes use Dailymotion, but I still watch Youtube sometimes too.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A bit of both. I just quit watching things on YouTube. Years ago I made it a point to not be tracked, use a third party client, and never subscribe to anything unless it could be done anonymous and third party.

I do have a subscription to Nebula and have three channels that I like and I hope it helps them, but I really only use it on the TV. Which I watch sparingly.

In general though: I just wont watch things on youtube and I really am not missing anything, because I almost always have something better to do.

[–] sureshot0@discuss.online 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah, there isn't anything super important on youtube, but they do have a massive free movie and music library. That keeps a lot of people coming back, but they're not curing cancer over there, you won't lose anything if you skip Youtube

[–] x264@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

My bet is it will only check for SynthID

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 6 points 1 week ago

Hello. Thank you for clicking on [this video]. Today. We will be looking at the topic of. Detecting eye videos on You Tube.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I just avoid videos with contrived scary headlines or the word "BANNED".

Will I be able to see that before clicking on the video? I just got an update and the video information is now squished to a single line. So if the channel name is long, I can't see the age of the video. If they add it to the end, everyone will just have long names to hide it.

[–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

The problem isn't spotting them. They're fucking obvious slop. The problem is that they have inundated every fucking crevice of that website so you can't watch a goddamn video without tripping over one.

load more comments
view more: next ›