this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
30 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29898 readers
2079 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 22 minutes ago

They are already forced to go in two days a week. How is that not sufficient?

I hope they win. The logic is sound and the demand makes no sense from a productivity standpoint.

[–] alanjaow@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

If you can do your job duties at home, there should be no reason to demand a return to office.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Stupid entitled shit from government employees which undermines public trust in government.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 6 points 56 minutes ago (1 children)

Utilizing maximum leverage over employers is a union's job. It's how we all get shit like the weekend. Public trust in government dies because priorities aren't in alignment with the interests of the people. If their job can be done just as well without return from home then how does wasting their time, gas, and space on the road speak to good priorities?

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz -2 points 52 minutes ago (2 children)

Just because I can do my job as well at home doesn’t mean it’s the same for the organization.

Having employees in office is critical for developing juniors into seniors.

No way I would have gotten as far in my career without being face to face with mentors.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 7 points 47 minutes ago

Sounds like you are unable to perform all aspects of your job from home.

I can certainly be mentored over Teams. In office time could be scheduled when convenient if there was truly a pressing need.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 minutes ago* (last edited 16 minutes ago)

Back when we were in the office, my manager was in a different office in a different time zone than me. The people I worked with were located all around the world. I would go in to work, having to often go in early or stay late, to take video calls with my coworkers.

Every once in a while, I’d fly to some other part of the world for a few weeks to train/mentor others, while dealing with jet lag.

My company was in the middle of realizing WFH made way more sense from a money and a training perspective when Covid hit.

We accelerated our plans and have been WFH ever since. I actually spend MORE time mentoring others now because instead of a 1 hour commute to work, I can hop online at 6 AM or 10 PM for a while and work directly with the people who need assistance.

And then I can take a chunk off in the middle of my day to go to the dentist, go for a walk, or work on personal projects.

Now, this isn’t the case for everyone, but for information workers who are already working in multiple locations, adjusting working style can result in MORE support of junior workers, and everyone’s quality of life increases.

The key is to not work from home as if you were commuting to an office. Different skills and techniques are required. Different people will be better at them.