this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
101 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30339 readers
2633 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It warms my heart that Vance and Rubio are considered the frontrunners. They've got the collective charisma of a semen-soaked sofa, which is to say that Rubio has none at all.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Vance has the stage presence of a wet paper bag. But Rubio has honed his craft since the 2016 water sipping days. He's much better at flinging out the red meat in a way liberals blink past but reactionaries salivate over.

Rubio will be banging the "Liberate Cuba" drum for all he's worth. Just like with Iran/Israel and China/Japan, half the Dems will clap when he announces plans for the next war.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Rubio is not going to get it either,. You know who would get it, who could take it, would be rfk, if it wasn't for his voice impediment.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Rubio is not going to get it either,

He was a favorite among the billionaire class in 2016 and a close ally of the Bush neocon wing. Thiel loves him. Bezos loves him. The Ukraine Hawks love him. Israel Hawks love him. Neoliberals think he's a guy they can do business with.

Look at his Senate confirmation vote. 99-0, with even Sanders showing up for him. If Trump implodes in 2026, he'll quickly become the corporate approved replacement.

I'm not saying that means he'll win. But absent a Trumpian figure in opposition, he'll be the Bush/McCain/Romney style candidate that Republican insiders have historically loved.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I certainly agree that the establishment will soon over him, what I do not think is that the base will accept them. Not for long. Just as the current president seized control of the Party Machine based on there alternative reality they've been spinning, someone more ruthless and better at talking shit will get it. I guess the last part is the important part, well along with being connected and you know, having organized crime doing your bidding. And by organized crime, forget the Italian mafia they're a bit player, we're talking about the corporations and their contractors and Security Consultants here. Corporate Mafia so to speak. Much worse more reach.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Wrong. Rubio has a lot of charisma. The issue with Rubio is he sold his soul for power and you can feel the ick imminating from him.

Now couchfucker has no charisma.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because Trump has so much charisma?

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm just glad that Trump not running anymore is out in the open now.

Reading abut the particularly disgusting court intrigues gave me nausea though.

And:

Mr. Trump compared Mr. Vance to Eliot Ness, the mob-busting federal agent, for working to ferret out fraud in mostly Democratic controlled states.

It's a disgrace that partisan & paranoid shit like this goes for politics these days.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump is too mercurial to trust. He may not be looking at the 2028 election right now, and letting people stretch their imaginations and dream of running, etc., but we all know that he has no intention of leaving in 2028. He ain't building that ballroom for the next guy, that's HIS.

It will really become apparent after the Midterms, when Dems start announcing their candidacies, and everybody looks at the MAGAs and ask who intends to run. There will be a lot of hemming and hawing, because nobody will want to be the first to say they want Trump out, because he'll see it as a betrayal. If anyone does announce, he'll attack them for being dumb enough to think they have a chance of replacing him.

And ultimately THAT will be his excuse: There is LITERALLY nobody in America, or the world, that can do a better job than him, and since we're in a war, it would be irresponsible to leave office, a blow to the nation from which they will never recover. It's his civic responsibility, his love for his country, that will keep him in office until the resolution of the war...

...in about 2 weeks. No longer.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe Pence will throw his hat in the race and Trump can try to kill him again.

It'd be a rerun, but I'd watch it on TV. Bonus points if he can catch Vance and Hegseth up as targets for the insurrectionist mob too this time.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Pence is only 66, just a kid.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago

I'm just glad that Trump not running anymore is out in the open now.

Huh?

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

Vance will not end with it. He was chosen because he's an unlikable little bitch that could not be used to supplant our dear leader

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

Trump has no intention of being replaced

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Trump isn’t sure he won’t be running is why…

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Now that Shady Vance's puppeteer has fled to Argentina I don't think his future is very bright.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I love that uncertainty for them.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

ELI5; why is JD Vance not in jail for Our Ohio Renewal? He raised $300K and all of it went to management fees.