this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
1306 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

11771 readers
1965 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 141 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She doesn't even need to be pregnant, you just have to claim to believe she was about to commit an abortion. Free women murders for everyone!

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's worse when you realize the bill isn't about the woman, but her doctor.

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well that explains why it's ok to kill a woman and therefore her fetus to prevent her from killing her fetus. It's not, but you can keep every abortion doctor in the area to prevent them from performing the procedure.

Do you have to have "standing"? Like do you actually have to even know the woman or is this just an open bounty on doctors?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dr_Fetus_Jackson@lemmy.world 111 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 67 points 1 month ago (5 children)

It's only pro life as long as the child is being carried.

Once the kids out, they don't give a fuck about the woman or her child. They could both die, and they'd have no issue with it.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

they don't actually care about the child, or its mother, before it's born, either. if they did, our health care system wouldn't be a for-profit scam.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 25 points 1 month ago

And they wouldn't be letting people use deadly force on pregnant women.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 27 points 1 month ago (7 children)

It’s only pro life as long as the child is being carried.

Not even then, at this point. Using 'deadly force' on a pregnant woman is not going to go well for the fetus.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Lemme get this right...

If you see someone trying to kill a woman while claiming she's trying to get an abortion, you can kill this attacker without issue under the legal classification of acting to protect two people, including a soon-born. Is this what Republicans want? To facilitate the legal argument to kill right-wingers? Because I'd be totally fine with that.

[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 1 month ago (2 children)

By similar logic, couldn't one kill the legislators who passed this bill? They are clearly inviting violence upon pregnant women, so it should theoretically be legal to kill them in defense of those women if this bill passes.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

don't bring logic in here!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you'd be legally right but the cops will still squeal up in their full military gear and shoot you all the same. Although to be fair they were probably going to do that anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Wouldn't the use of deadly force to prevent the abortion actually aid the abortion?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Look, if they thought things through they wouldn’t be Republicans.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Iampossiblyatwork@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Doesn’t using deadly force on a pregnant woman defeat the purpose entirely?

[–] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

Depends on what you think the true purpose of a law like this would be.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not if you're using deadly force against a doctor willing to perform an abortion, which is the more likely intent of the law.

Or the driver taking her somewhere. Or the person who called the driver.

And so on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 15 points 1 month ago

Shhhh, logic is not allowed here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 41 points 1 month ago (5 children)

From a practical standpoint how does one prevent the death of an unborn child via the use of deadly force against its mother?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I think its more about legalizing shooting doctors. What a healthy country we live in.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

It's a law legalizing the murder of Planned Parenthood staff and Democrats who want to overturn the law.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Is this just a way to shoot your pregnant mistress for free?

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Only if she's trying to get an abortion

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

What's she going to do? Testify she wasn't?

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

We should probably try to find the girlfriend of this bill's sponsor. I'm concerned for her safety.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nectar45@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Republicans hate women"

I think even republicans know that republicans hate women at this point

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlindPenguin@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago
[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 23 points 1 month ago

Republicans hate everything. They're a brainless death cult only outclassed by Christians as a whole.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

On the flip side, it says that a person can use force, including deadly force, to prevent death or harm to themselves or another person.

So hypothetically, your doctor, is using lethal force, to prevent the person inside you from harming you.

Totally legal as the law is written.

IANAL ; best option is to move out of regressive states, and set the place on fire before you leave.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As long as you say “he’s abortioning right at me!” you can kill em and ain’t nothing Johnny Law can do about it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Fortunately, the thing says it's a bill, and not that it's been passed into law.

If a state does pass a law like that, it's hard to see why any sane woman would want to remain in that state.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 27 points 1 month ago

it’s hard to see why any sane woman would want to remain in that state

Plenty of people don't want to stay in a place they are oppressed, but the thing about being oppressed is that it often also makes it hard to leave that place.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 13 points 1 month ago

Bills like these get passed quietly and in darkness. I agree with your sentiment, but it's on us to build the uproar that prevents it from making it any further.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

It doesn't sound like Hate, it sounds like Slavery.

Hate would be activelly going out and trying to kill women, whilst punishing them for not letting their bodies be used by others as objects is, IMHO, much more a Slaver's take on other human beings.

A Slaver's motivation would also be pretty in tune with Tradition for Republican members of the power elites in North Carolina.

[–] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Removing the remnants of a miscarriage is also coded as an abortion. So theres still plenty of hate in this bill as well.

Hopefully they won't pass a law requiring shotgun weddings in the case of pregnancy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

More accurately: someone raped a 14 year old girl, the pregnancy has become ectopic. The punishment for trying to save her life is worse than the person who raped a 14 year old.

[–] zout@fedia.io 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Is it normal in the USA to allow the general population to use deadly force? That's fucked up.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How'd the USA get to be a nation in the first place?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tsfehsim@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I swear to god they’re trying to legislate a civil war. They preach us vs them political rhetoric and want everyone running around with a gun. What a shit time to call yourself an American, but then again I’m not sure there ever was a good time.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] andyburke@fedia.io 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yo, everyone, this is aimed at the doctors, regardless of their gender.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Here is the proposed text of the NC state constitutional amendment affirming personhood at conception, then including:

Any person has the right to defend his or her own life or the life of another person, even by the use of deadly force if necessary, from willful destruction by another person.

Here is the NC Dept. of Health and Human Service’s required abortion information describing the state’s abortion laws. They ban after 12 weeks, with exceptions for rape and incest before 20 weeks, and life-threatening anomalies before 24 weeks.

Here from the Raleigh Observer quoting state democratic lawmaker Rep. Julie von Haefen:

Von Haefen said the bill is a distraction from other bills being voted on and passed, including multiple constitutional amendments concerning unions and taxes, at least some of which will be on the ballot for North Carolinians to weigh. She said the amendments “are being used to drive conservative voter turnout.”

And here is my take: NC state republicans use women’s healthcare as a political pawn for pushing anti-worker and anti-tax interests, which neatly encapsulates the US culture war for the past 60 years. This bill will not pass, because it is insane, but it may succeed in its intent: looting the pockets of the people of NC.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This bill will not pass, because it is insane, but it may succeed in its intent: looting the pockets of the people of NC.

how many times have we said "It wont happen, it cant happen, its too insane" in the past 10 years? only for it to very much happen?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Killing live people - women, children, POCs, poor, other countries, etc - has always been acceptable and even promoted by Republicans. It's only ending potential pregnancies when they "care" about lives. Except of course when it's their wife, mistress, daughter who wants an abortion, then it's ok.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 10 points 1 month ago

This could be a completely serious Orphan Crushing Machine solution in the minds of conservative basic dickheads.

"If somebody is already gonna go out in a blaze of glory, why not point them towards doctors and women's healthcare rather than schools? Nailed it."

load more comments
view more: next ›