this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
27 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12042 readers
423 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Appeal court finds woman was 'constructively dismissed' when forced back into the office without notice

This sets a precedent that changing remote workers work location qualifies as a no-fault firing or “layoff.”

But the trial judge sided with Parolin, finding that her flexible working hours had become an enforceable, fundamental term of her employment and had been supported for years by her employer. 

The judge also found the company's change to this arrangement was made unilaterally and without notice.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unilaterally changing someone’s terms of employment is a layoff.

How is that a question?

When I start any job I sign a piece of paper, the company doesn’t get to pretend that didn’t happen, nor can they just change the terms without negotiation. It’s a contract. It binds both directions.

Doing that should make them liable to legal suits.

Now, I get that we have “at will” employment in most of this country that idolizes the US, but that does not mean you can magically void whatever contracts you want.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right, but what if remote work wasn't in your employment contract? Like for just about everyone who started remote work during the pandemic.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Same thing.

During Covid I got a new contract which specified my primary workplace as work from home. That was agreeable so I signed it.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Yes but, also

Tracy Parolin, had had a flexible work schedule with her employer, Cressey Construction Corporation, since returning from maternity leave in 2013 after giving birth to twins, one of whom had a significant health issue

the court may have ruled in the employer's favour if Parolin didn't have the flexible work arrangement prior to the pandemic.

"For many employers, where they temporarily had their employees go home only because of the pandemic, they'll be in a much better situation if they wish to call employees back to the office," she said.

So I would take this precedent with a grain of salt. It does NOT mean that employers can't transition an employee from remote to office; it means that employers just can't be too much of a dick about doing it especially for employees who had it negotiated it individually.