this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
10 points (55.0% liked)

Memes

55918 readers
881 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fancy_Gecko@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

one of them is a free country , the other one is occupied by USA

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

That's not hyperbole by the way, the military in the south is literally under US command. In September 1945, the US Army Military Government in Korea (USAMGIK) took over the southern half of the peninsula. It ruled for three full years, outlawed local people's committees, and kept using the old Japanese colonial bureaucracy. That is a textbook military occupation. When the Korean War broke out in 1950, the US provided 90 percent of all combat forces and placed the South Korean military under the operational control of an American general. There weren't even any elections under the occupation until the late 80s. It was a literal dictatorship.

That control has never truly gone away. Today, South Korea is under de facto US military occupation. The US runs Camp Humphreys, the largest overseas US base on the planet, with its own postal service and currency. More importantly, the US controlled Combined Forces Command holds wartime operational control over the entire South Korean military. If fighting resumes, Seoul's army does not answer to Seoul, but to a four star American general. And a US dominated UN Command still publicly dictates what South Korea's parliament can legislate near the DMZ.

Under the current Combined Forces Command structure, if war breaks out tomorrow, every South Korean soldier would automatically answer to an American commander without Seoul’s consent. It is a 70‑year‑old military subordination that the US has repeatedly delayed transferring. As of May 2026, the US insists on "conditions‑based" transfer and opposes a "politically convenient" timeline. South Korea’s president himself is pushing back against this delay. A foreign general holding final command over a sovereign nation’s military in wartime is, by any definition, continuing military occupation.

[–] 1Malayali@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The yin-yang red-blue thing, but inside a star?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This was the flag of the People's Republic of Korea, before Korea was split and the people's councils declared illegal in the south.

[–] Maven@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I genuinely really like this flag.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

It's cool! Also a shame that the PRK was dissolved, much tragedy has happened across the peninsula because the US dissolved it.

[–] 1Malayali@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is quite nice. Would be cool if they use it after reunification

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Would be, I agree!