this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
499 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

85245 readers
4252 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] usernametbd@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Use LibreWolf instead. Fuck Brave.

[–] InfernoWarrior@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

This is why I use Waterfox paired with DuckDuckGo tbh. Brave is a scummy company.

Brave sucks, lol, I use other browsers

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 304 points 3 days ago (16 children)

Yet people keep recommending products by this scummy company and pile on Firefox for slightest missteps.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 166 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

Mozilla should be scrutinized, even if Firefox is currently the best option.

I think the only thing keeping them inline is loud community backlash everytime they make one of those misssteps.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 52 points 3 days ago (3 children)

People dont seem to be scrutinizing though. Its genuinely unhinged and often completely misinformed. They will jump on a single line of a legal text and use it to springboard into a world of scenarios even when Mozilla is saying its not true.

It doesnt help improve the product it just makes people think all products are bad and fallback to whatever the comfortable majority is which is chrome.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think everyone should be held to the same standard. We can yell at Firefox a bit less. We should yell at Brave a lot more.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 51 points 3 days ago

They removed the paw, they are worse than Chrome! I'm going to use an alternative version that cannot exist without the main project to teach them a lesson!

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 days ago

"Origin" is a peculiar choice for a version name. I wonder if they're trying to go off of the popularity of a common extension

There's no way people will actually pay for this, right? ... right?

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 25 points 2 days ago

Brave runs an ad network.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 134 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Brave has always been a joke. And Brave users will always be a joke. And anyone who’s ever simped for Brave will always be a moron.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Rude. But not inaccurate. Brave pretends to be better than Chrome and Google, but also Mozilla and Firefox at the same time, though Firefox has always done it better and has never contributed to the chromium monopoly. Greed over diversification of the Web and competition between browser engines to effect real change. The least Brave could do is make their own engine.

Rude. But not inaccurate.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 67 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Firefox users stay winning. I love how mad some people are about Firefox.

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago

I am not mad about Firefox. I am mad about Mozilla.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel like if you're writing the sentence "an optional, paid version of our browser that offers Brave [...] without its extra features," you need to sit back and take a long, hard look at yourself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Awesome, monetization of enshittification.

Fuck that leaky browser. Asshole development.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The bad news is, if you're not on Team Tux, you're going to have to pay $60 for Brave Origin. Granted, you only need to buy it once, and you'll get unlimited activations across all of your devices.

It's amazing people still believe this BS.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 days ago

That’s a brave move.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 55 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Brave thinks its users are suckers

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Its founder and CEO thinks that gay people shouldn't have rights, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago

Brave lets people use Origin for free if they're on Linux

lol

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Reminds me of a joke:

My dad always warned us about Septic Tank Steve, and that we should never pay him to do anything, and we should have listened. One day Steve came by and said if we gave him a nickel, he'd swim around in the septic tank. We thought that was hilarious, so we gave him a nickel, and he swam around the tank a while. Then he came and sat next to us on the porch and said "If you want me to leave, gimme $100."

[–] Sidhean@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Well, we'll toss him back in if he likes it so much. Maybe sell off the ladder if he really wants to stay :)

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Are brave and Plex related?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›