bUt WhAtAbOuT wHeN iT's nIghTime u sTUpId LIbS!?!?!
-MF's who have never heard of a battery
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
943 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
85756 readers
4758 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
they're also getting the benefits of solar, despite voting for the moron nixing renewables while peddling coal and oil.
States won by President Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election accounted for 74% of all solar capacity installed in the first quarter
Part of that is because of how fucking empty the middle fly over states are.
Or simply run dirty energy as a last resort. You don’t need to, and shouldn’t be, dependent on a single energy source.
"Pffft ... batteries are for toys ... my delusions tell me the following pictures are fake because I say so and I don't need to prove anything because jesus tells me petroholics like me are always right:"
Obviously fake, everybody knows that batteries are ruined by rain. Just like magnets.
Next you're gonna tell me that the Moon can come out during the day!
Heard a fantastic quote this morning for people with similar believes:
This are the same people who ask ChatGPT what time it is
Beautiful !
I've unironically met people who use ChatGPT for everything. (and who unironically now think magnets are turned off by water since the president said it)
Like I literally had coffee with someone who while we were chatting they mentioned that they "asked ChatGPT if the place was queer friendly" before they agreed to go out for coffee.
It's like bro, did the pride flags year round not tip you off? The maps link literally has pictures of the place with snow on the ground and pride flags in the windows!
So many people have forgotten how to think and it's infuriating. They'll believe a chatbot before their own eyes.
That's great and all, but I'm still waiting for it to be affordable to install my own so that it can also be a whole-house uninterruptible power supply.
Obviously it depends on your use case but at least for me having an uninterruptible power supply for the maybe one day in 4 years that I have a power cut, it isn't worth it unless the installation cost is negligible.
I think for most people putting a few panels on the roof is probably good enough. Especially if they end up getting an electric car in the end which can do reverse charging.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
They've heard plenty about battery, it's on their arrest records
All you need to do is put a solar panel under a lamp post, infinite electricity.
Just give the solar panels legs so they can walk around the earth following the sun.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Stand to reason, the operating costs of a coal fired power station are immense compared to a renewable energy source. They can’t compete. That’s the major reason that industry doesn’t want to build them.
Here in Michigan Trump is using "emergency" orders to keep a coal plant running that the electric company was going to retire over a year ago. The order can only last 90 days but they've just renewed it every time.
Thanks to this bullshit, rates are going up because it's costing so much to keep the thing going we're losing money on it. Consumers Energy doesn't even want to be operating it, they're trying to get it shut down but hur dur coal good can't allow that. And it's not the only one affected by this crap.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/05/climate/trump-aging-coal-plants-electricity-bills
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
but experts say coal emits carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, and several other pollutant
What the hell is this crap reporting. It's not like this is a contested fact or an opinion.
"Experts say power plants 'burn coal to convert water into steam.'"
I mean, does anyone really know how these things operate?
Every power source is a solar power source if you follow the trail back far enough.
load more comments
(7 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Surprised the Pedo-in-Chief doesn't immediately halt this so he can get more money from the coal lobbyists
He's been trying! Courts keep overturning it but it's been on and off for both wind and solar construction
The MAGA response "No it didn't! No it didn't! Fox and The Anointed One didn't say so! Fake news! Fake news!"
Coal is black and dusty, solar panels are black and clean, it's clean coal as promised!
In spite of the idiocracy
Solar is more efficient. The corporations will move over to the most efficient power source regardless of what the administration may or may not want. Continuing to use coal just to appease Trump is stupid.
Anyway they can just lie and say that they are using coal for everything, it's not like anyone is going to check
load more comments
(5 replies)
This is actually a pretty major indictment on the US. Coal is one of the worst most inefficient fuel sources for power generation, virtually every other fuel source is an improvement including incineration of food waste.
A good test of how efficient fuel is is to see how much of it you still have left after you've theoretically burnt all of it. The fact that coal smoke is black is a pretty good indication of how bad it is. You're throwing away a good chunk of your fuel.
I love the trivia that there's traces of uranium in coal which go up with the smoke - coal is worse than nuclear in terms of radiological pollution.
When looking if it was feasible to convert coal power plants to nuclear, we found out that most of the coal sites have more radioactivity than is allowed for a future nuclear site
load more comments
(4 replies)
Progress be progress. We’ll get there folks.
I genuinely couldn’t believe it. Wow.
Great, but that doesn't mean less coal is being burned. The article says the share of coal in the total power of the US has been halved over the last five years but again, how much less coal has been burned? That's the important part.
Only speaking in parts tends to miss this:
On a global scale, energy sources cumulate, they don't replace each other.
Don’t let drumpf know, he’ll find a way to have it reversed. Remywhen he used usa taxpayer funds (a billion or so usd) to cancel a windfarm?
First time ? (Spaniard here)
Capitalism does work afterall
view more: next ›