this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
875 points (99.4% liked)

Memes

56928 readers
434 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 132 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

hey usa, china is building tons of high-speed rail. they're the leaders in decarbonizing their energy mix. they're building tons of housing to handle population growth. they're financing infrastructure projects in the global south. why not try beating them at all that?

no? just wars again? okay.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 64 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Chinese people own their homes too

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Even with more property rights. If you own a house and you don't want to sell it when they want to build a new highway, they build the highway surrounding your house, instead of expropriating you like in western countries.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

tbh living there in the middle of a highway would be hell

it is disappointing how despite how ahead china is in terms of public transit, they still build car-centric infrastructure like this. at least, unlike north america, shitty car-centric infrastructure is not all there is lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've never had to use the term 'Passive-Aggressive Infrastructure' before but I'm here for it and loving it

[–] tpyo@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago
[–] axx@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Fascinating as it may be, that's a pretty horrible picture.

Imagine living that house. It's a pretty stark demonstration of the state gets what it wants, one way or another.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 75 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It is absolutely maddening to see American pundits defend every dumbshit, ruinous, genocidal policy over the last twenty years by pointing at China and claiming, "We had to show them we were the boss".

From AI to A-bombs, there's nothing you can't get away with by insisting "China Bad! This will stop them!"

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

We are operating from a position of strength!

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 months ago

It's a very convenient go-to excuse. And as long as the American public keeps lapping it up, those in power will keep counting on it.

[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They can't admit the only reason has been "Money!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 59 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The US is basically a "this is good for bitcoin", but as a country.

Its slow, humiliating, public suicide is even more pathetic than great britain's.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

I, for one, think it's funny.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 54 points 2 months ago (7 children)

China: "Wow they're a lot less tough than we thought"

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml 45 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I'd put money on China being able to pwn the USA with the click of a button. We know about salt typhoon, and there's been documented backdoors in IoT devices and some Unitree bots. Imagine all the things we don't know about. Especially regarding power generation and general aging infrastructure.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 months ago (16 children)

Buddy, I could tell you that based on the fact that they've lost every single war they've been in since WWII.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] fanbois@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

An open conflict between the US and china would probably end with exactly zero winners and an uninhabitable glowing piece of rock orbiting the sun. Maybe the cockroaches can then find a better path to communism.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pticrix@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think Americans should ban debate clubs. Clearly they're only teaching how to create mental convolutions instead of creating sound arguments.

[–] sangeteria@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Americans should consider doing mathematical convolution instead. Very important for functional analysis with deep connections to the Laplace, and thus Fourier, transforms.

[–] subverted_per@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Oh no, debate clubs are actually very good at teaching kids how to discern good information from bad, and how to make proper arguments with supporting evidence. Right wing media teaches gish gallop and never be wrong, it's these two ideas that have taken over discourse.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 months ago

I thing losing $400b will greatly help to put china in its place

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 29 points 2 months ago

Literally the equivalent of a homeless libertarian laughing at well to do, middle class Chinese people because he thinks he's better off

demonstrating that the US is willing

Yes, because America is famous for the ambiguity around whether or not we'd go to war with global South nations

and able

No

In that sense, it was already won

The government can behave like a rabid dog, but China would Old Yeller America

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

China and Iran are allies.

If the US and China go to war Iran will close the strait to their enemies. And we’ve seen the US is impotent to that and overly reliant on oil.

I think China just has to deal with a first strike from the US and then wait for an impotent United States to fall apart and starve.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] axx@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 months ago

How can people be so delusional?

"When their salary depends on it" is a decent first answer.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Whoever wrote this is an idiot.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ardha@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Yeah giving away the weakness of all our equipments iranians hurt to china is such a huge deterrant bruv

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago

Remember folks, the guy is a master of the deal

load more comments
view more: next ›