Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
sudo in Windows.Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/52191489
As a nix user, I wouldn't laugh. We are vulnerable to this type of attack as well.
Heck, it's surprising we aren't full of malware considering how many packages there are, and an easy supply chain attack vector with auto RyanTM PRs.
It's possible, but at the very least someone glances over the derivation since it's part of the actual nixpkgs repo right? AUR on the other hand is a wild west.
Yeah if the url is https://i_hack.you/ yeah that will be easy to spot. But imagine an attacker just to a "patch update", updating the url and hash to the malicious repository, and use a typo squatted domain/repository, that will make it harder to spot.
No, it would actually be quite easy to spot.
Nixpkgs templates the source code url fro the url, and then it injects a variable
Here is an example from bash:
pname = "bash${lib.optionalString interactive "-interactive"}";
version = "5.3${fa.patch_suffix}";
patch_suffix = "p${toString (builtins.length upstreamPatches)}";
src = fetchurl {
url = "mirror://gnu/bash/bash-$%7Blib.removeSuffix fa.patch_suffix fa.version}.tar.gz";
hash = "sha256-DVzYaWX4aaJs9k9Lcb57lvkKO6iz104n6OnZ1VUPMbo=";
};
If the url were to be changed, it would show up as a change in git when someone is reviewing before merging.
Yea. especially if you use flakes heavily. Itβs so decentralized it could take longer to catch.
I don't see how it would happen. Nix is immune bc hashes are constantly checked, you can't swap in malicious code without a person noticing bc it might throw a mismatched hash error. Also nixpkgs has been really good about vetting packages, I don't expect them to look too closely into the source codes of everything but if something malicious were to happen like what is happening to AUR someone would see it way faster
The AUR attack attacked the build files. On nix, you could easily set a new download url for the package, set the new hash, and claim the project has moved to a new repo/site.
That would require a second person to vet on it, but it could be seen as normal for a maintainer not in the know about the project.
New packages are harder to pass, but it could also work.
COPR: "You guys are actually sharing your packages with other people?"
AUR: it happened to me, and one day it will happen to you!
This is still the shai hulud worm.
Thereβs no reason nixpkgs hasnβt been hacked yet. It jest depends on a few devs credentials being stolen, either by vscode, an npm package, a pypi dep, etc.
I remember when, I think it was either a log4j or CUPS malware attack, Debian remained unaffected because the packages in its repos was too old.
debian stable misses a lot of the 'fun'.
Slow and steady wins the race
I mean, no one is stopping you from using Nix on Arch
I believe I even got the reverse, pacman working on Nix (I've also gotten it and archiso working on Fedora)
You... Monster.
Running both ... Nixpkgs will rightfully laugh about this - in about a month once they caught up on recent events.
Loving both arch and nixos though!
Y'all just haven't noticed yet.
We're any chaotic-aur packages affected?
Running both ... Nixpkgs will rightfully laugh about this - in about a month once they caught up on recent events.
Loving both arch and nixos though!