this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
715 points (99.4% liked)

Flippanarchy

2565 readers
301 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bread@thelemmy.club 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This seems like a missed opportunity. The boss wants AI to do more AI great. Get Gemini to answer Claudes questions and go play pokemon.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago

*cookie clicker

Ftfy

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I asked AI one question. What is this plant. It told me it was a sunflower and it confidently listed a bunch of reasons. I told it it was wrong because I grow sunflowers and it looks completely different so that’s my experience with AI it confidently tells you the wrong answer. It makes sense though because these tech bro idiots just confidently make up wrong answers too. Anyway it’s a four o clock flower.

[–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

May I present:

“A rose” according to ai.

Its a neglected mint.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not so sure gardening is for you if you can do that to mint.

No offense intended. Just looking out for the plants' sake.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 13 hours ago

Killing mint is itself a talent to be nurtured.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Na it’s a flower.

[–] BioDriver@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Someone I work with just wrapped their PhD with a dissertation on “AI Ethics.” It was not how to use AI responsibly. It was about how to be ethical towards the AIs themselves and humanize them. We’re so fucked.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Damn. Well, we tried the best economic system and it didn't work. Guess the species is toast. Nothing else to do but drop the bombs, end it quick

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And they were able to successfully defend that?

[–] BioDriver@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apparently. It’s a smaller school that’s trying to justify their funding with publications and graduations

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, the corrupting influence of money again.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I had a bit of a psychotic break recently when I saw that the way money flows is more determinative of any outcome than any relationship to the truth or ethics.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago

In a way, the real matrix was the banking app you used along the way

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

This is happening at the top of every major company is the crazy thing.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

I've said this before but I'll try to lay it out here again.

Basically, the 'Dilbert Principle' or 'Peter Principle' of who gets promoted is essentially true: Idiots get moved into management, initally to minimize the harm they can cause to actual specific technical tasks/workflows, and they are then promoted untill they hit a point where their incompetence cannot be ignored and is apparent to all.

But what usually is not touched on much, is the psychological profile of such a person.

So, they're a technically incompetent idiot, whose life revolves around experiencing the successes snf failures of others... as their own. They primarily perform their job of management via emotional feeling/experiencing. If their underlings do well, the manager is treated as if they are competent. If their underlings do not do well, the manager becomes angry and punishes them, often without regard to how this will impact others in the org, often without full understanding of the technical complexities of the situation.

This is literally a perfect environment for a narcissist. There basically could not be a better engineered social/relational situation for giving the narcissist narcissistic supply.

So... this is the mechanism that explains why so many managers/c suite tend to be malignant or at least covert narcissists.

But this also explains at least one avenue of susceptibility to AI psychosis. AIs are also exceptional at providing narcissistic supply, they're naturally sycophantic, and can well convince an incompetent idiot that they essentially know everything.

This creates a feedback doom-loop of human hierachichal organizations that promote and reward narcissism, whose 'top people' then use the plargiarist sycophantic fake supergenius machine to convince themselves that they actually don't need anybody else, they just need their one super smart buddy who unconditionally praises them.

Maybe call it the wormtongue principle/effect, if we want to continue the already existing trend in AI world of perverting and bastardizing concepts from Tolkien.

AI is more likely to make the worst kinds of people... super-worse, basically, because they're even better at providing narcissistic supply than the inherent fascism of the typical leadership-lackey social rules of capitalist business.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

the wormtongue effect

I love this phrase. I'm going to use it.

And this is a great comment in general, thanks. I'm favoriting it.

It also makes perfect sense: RHLF and other LLM "final stage" tuning techniques literally optimize for sycophancy. It isn't an inherent property of LLMs, persay (which you can see if you try base models or "anti-sycophancy" finetunes), but its baked into consumer-facing models to an unbelievable degree.


The only slight retort I have is that social media already provided a personalized, sycophantic "wormtongue" fix. So narcissicsts were already pre-conditioned to turn to these tech portals.

Chat-tuned LLMs just perfected that and took it up to 11.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I agree with your fine-tune.

Yes, the mass profliferation of pocket black mirrors was indeed the transitional step, the foundation of systemic weaponized narcissism upon which its essentially 'ideal' form has been built.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly the idea that they are selling people their own wormtongue is actually about right, its wild that one of the companies involved is even palantir.

But yeah this is meant to get everyone separated and with only 1 person to talk to, the computer, which will never belittle you or correct you. It will just casually lock you in your cage and say that you never could have done anything without it. Learned helplessness with dopamine feedback loop.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am so tired of being sold the lie that computers are the more efficient humans.

As if all humans do is optimize and say nice things.

[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm tired of being expected to chase efficiency in every aspect of my life as if that's the only thing that matters.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 16 hours ago

Data! Its for making sure you life is lived exactly according to the perfect life sheet!

I will never ever respect anybody who automates their life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (5 children)

In response to the last bit OP said.

Yesterday one of my coworkers mentioned that a lot of people in their 20s are into 90s stuff now, to an extent that our generation (people who grew up in the 90s) didn't feel about prior decades. She posited that the idea behind it is "breaking free of technology" for a generation that never lived in a world without it.

I'm not close to many people in their 20s these days and I don't use TikTak or any other social media, so I don't know how accurate that is. But if that is the case, I can totally understand wanting to escape to a tech-free world.

Knowing and experiencing a disconnected world is one of the few things I wouldn't give up from childhood. I was enamored with the Internet when popular adoption began in the mid to late 90s but it was a separate world that you could actually exit. I could still communicate with peers and friends without this layer of memes and affected irony between us.

[–] Piatro@programming.dev 30 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yeah I feel this even as a millennial. The tech we grew up with was exciting, constantly improving, generally not exploiting us, always getting cheaper. For gen z they've grown up when tech was abundant but always getting worse, more expensive and more exploitative.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 134 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Please do not outsource your thinking to an AI

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] topperharlie@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

I think one benefit of AI is that it helps identifying mediocre people without a clue or understanding of the work they are supposed to be doing. The sad part is that since these people tend to be higher in the hierarchy, it doesn't materialize on getting rid of them...

[–] EmpatheticTeddyBear@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We have been told that we NEED to find ways to use AI at work. So I use it to remove corporate buzzwords/jargon from incoming emails and translate it all into plain language speech. Then I email it back and ask the person if that is what they meant.

I'm getting a lot less emails these days and more work accomplished.

Bonus: my supervisor learned what I've been doing and now they are doing it too.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 16 hours ago
[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Way to impress by implementing cutting-edge AI solutions! Expertly streamlining complex processes and achieving unprecedented levels of productivity through synergistic solutions is proof that you’re hungry for success

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›