π Learn π to π squash π those π commits π
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
123 points (92.4% liked)
Programmer Humor
31992 readers
495 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Seriously. My colleague does the same shit and it made me so mad until I realised he was on his branch. Then I was like, whatever, as long as you do a proper MR.
You don't just write your entire project, then make your first commit?
/j
I do kinda do that with the initial commit (don't commit anything until I have something really basic that works). It feels awkward to commit code that does nothing.
That's all I ever commit
Yeh I use git (git commit --amend)
git commit --amend --no-edit and git push --force-with-lease
No-edit skips opening an editor for the commit message and just reuses the same message.
Force-with-lease will force push but only if your local is not missing commits that remote has. Ie other people haven't pushed anything since you last pulled.
If you're comfortable with whatever text editor git uses, give git rebase -i a try.
load more comments
(11 replies)
I cannot give you a 100% for consistency. You have three inconsistent check in messages: 'tet', 'FueraEstanciaRowRename', and 'Revert "test"'. You must be uniformly informative with your messages.
rebase & fixup or reset are your friends
I love editing history. Fix the bug in the change that introduced it!
Then force-push, and fuck up someone's day!
git branches are free
work in your tree
til the changes are ready
300 git push --force-with-lease a day and nobody mad
load more comments
(11 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(17 replies)
[Test] around and find out
A dev on windows? Of course that's your git log!
You need to learn refactoring/squashing
Looks like a normal branch where someone debugs some GitHub workflow.
Is it humor because we make fun of you?
More like laughs out of relatability. Tho I am getting dogpiled for the industry standard practice of using what the company provides.
well yeah, in an enterprise project we would say "chore(test)". Semantic release ftw!
Me when learning GH Actions/CI/CD
nonsense, I would never use windows
I see I'm not the only one fighting with CI/CD pipelines.
my private repo is filled with "stuff", "more stuff", "new stuff", "changes" commits.
Whenever I work on something, I donβt intend on publishing, I use What the commit.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next βΊ