this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
51 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

85672 readers
3753 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 7 hours ago

I could never get much into online gaming because it’s a full time job keeping up with the meta and if you are not highly skilled you are just cannon fodder.

I’ll stick to single player games. And for the most part, I’m just playing retro games these days.

Modern games kinda suck half the time. Only good things I’ve played in modern times are the resident evil remakes and some indie stuff.

[–] c64z86@piefed.world 31 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe it's because a lot of new games coming out today are buggy, micro transaction filled pieces of crud?

[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You forgot poorly optimized and the idiotic anti cheat engines.

[–] c64z86@piefed.world 1 points 1 minute ago
[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 22 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Or maybe not everyone wants another FPS with gamble boxes?

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 34 points 12 hours ago

Have you considered, hear me out, that some players just hate playing with other players, because being insulted breaks immersion?

All the other micro transaction fuckery you do on top just makes it yet more unappealing.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 80 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago

"We think giving the players funny hats that cross over will make them play Fortnite more."

Big Monty Python's Meaning of Life energy here.

[–] TroublesomeTalker@feddit.uk 12 points 10 hours ago

Until Tim Sweeney does something about Tim fucking Sweeney I am good thanks.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 25 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

How the fuck am I suppose to make new friends when I can't consistently connect with people unless they are already my friend? This wasn't a problem back when games were mostly on dedicated servers where the same groups would hang out consistently, day after day, so you'd actually get to know people.

[–] Dvixen@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

For real. Everyone already has their friend group, their clique, whatever. They often say they are open and welcoming, and sometimes are for a while. They don't try to get to know the newcomer, regale then with stories of their already set in stone group, and make promises they have no intention of keeping. Newcomer leaves, and they don't even notice or care to reach out, and if they do, it's purely performative and there's no follow through because they already have their group.

[–] phailhaus@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, you used to get to know the players and come back to certain servers because of the community around them. There was one TF2 server I played on for a while that had a guy who played exclusively melee Heavy with extremely throttled Internet, causing him to teleport around. You don't get guys like Magical Fisting Heavy anymore.

[–] dil@piefed.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

Just needed no sbmm, can't rematch against the same ppl anymore

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

You can still do that in many games.

It's just organized unofficially in Discord groups. And... yeah, Discord is mandatory :(

[–] mrbn@lemmy.ca 13 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Epic shared plans for “portable content, codes and economies” between UE-developed games, with Fortnite slated to be the first real proof of concept. In Fortnite’s case, portability will allow cosmetics obtained or purchased in-game to be used in other UE games and vice versa. Additionally, UE6’s cross-game social link feature will allow players to be connected to one game, but voice chat with people playing another.

The first part seems like a new concept we haven't seen in other games. Buy one skin, use it everywhere. I bet they're going to fuck it up with their greed somehow, but it's a neat concept and provides more value to people who buy skins.

The second part, and last sentence, is basically just discord, team speak, etc. I don't buy or use Epic's stuff, but if I understand it correctly, some dumbass thought it was a good idea to only allow voice channels for people playing the same game 🤣🤣🤣

[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Buy one skin, use it everywhere.

That's how they tried to sell NFTs in games to us iirc. Buy a gun skin or obtain a specific gun in CoD and use it in another game. I dunno how that was supposed to work, but I remember that marketing spin when they were trying to make them a thing.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's probably my lack of understanding of UR, but how do you have the same skin in multiple games for different character or items models? Are they going to update every game when there is a new skin released or is this somehow done dynamically?

[–] mrbn@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I will start by saying that I have no idea what their plans are and I am not a game or game engine dev.

how do you have the same skin in multiple games for different character or items models?

I think what we'll see is the model and mesh of the skins will be loadable by the game via the engine. I'm assuming they'll have a standard that contains the hitbox and model/mesh to put on the character. Then the game dev could tweak gobally the scaling (as an example) to make all skins fit nicely into their game. Same for guns and such. But game devs who want to opt in[1] to this will have to use the engine API to make it work.

Are they going to update every game when there is a new skin released

I would assume that the game itself won't need to be recompiled or updated but rather the engine will download the newest skins in some common and reusable place. And then the engine swaps one model for another.

[1] my suspicion is that the tech will be licensed to the game makers. Especially if they plan on allowing copyright characters (like Marvel characters).

And again, please take everything I said with some salty grains or something as I am only speculating.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

All of that sounds like it makes sense. I'm wondering how do you say buy a fortnite skin for a specific shaped character, then use it in a game where the character model is wildly different. I know very little about game game dev and even less so about how character art is made and turned into a 3d model. It just seems like the skins would have to be individually created for each game. That may not be too bad at first, but the bigger the game catalog, the more maintenance.

I'm very much not the demo for this kind of thing, but the tech behind it sounds interesting. I'm just waiting for them to say they're doing it with AI to take my distaste for Epic and multiplying it tenfold.

[–] dil@piefed.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

There were automation demos by ue If I remember correctly showing different size and types of bodies wearing the same outfits, mightve been reallusion or something else, either way AAA devs would have access to the tools/knowledge to remodel the clothes to fit manually for their game.

[–] grandma@sh.itjust.works 40 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

It is impossible to satirize this guy

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

he gives free onion article advice.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 13 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Damn it, who anthropomorphized satire and let it run a company!?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

My question is.....how are they still in business???

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

Maybe consider some of us just want to play with friends and/or spouses or partners.

Reintroduce LAN play and locally hosted multiplayer servers. IDGAF about playing with randos, I just want to play with my wife, and I’d prefer it to not be something that can shut down because the company went broke or didn’t care anymore.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I don't have the personal budget to buy a lot of games. Pay me more and I'll spend more. Otherwise, fuck all the way off

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, I get it, but.....unless you work for Epic, I'm not seeing how Epic would have sny say at all in how much you get paid.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 1 points 11 hours ago

It's a demand pointed out the entire capitalist hellscape, of which epic is a part, not them specifically.

Sweeney's a billionaire. He could be pushing for labor to have a bigger slice of the pie. But he won't, because he's a soulless husk.

[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 17 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, nothing will help attract players like diluting any weak identity it already had with an open deluge of metaverse slop. Everything will be everything. It's not enough to have a product anymore, it has to be a whole ecosystem. God forbid a single bloody dollar slip through your grasp.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

This guy lives in a very specific bubble on his own.

[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Guess we will see if GTA6 online fails due to not being in the unreal ecosystem

[–] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.today 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Rockstar lost me when they added invasive anticheat to GTAV. It was a great game prior to that, but take away something I've been enoying for almost 10 years on a whim and don't allow me to play it anymore because I'm on Linux? Goodbye and good riddance. Not touching anything they put out ever again.

[–] dudeface@lemmy.world -5 points 12 hours ago

I’m sure they will survive

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

it's already failed for me.

I ain't touching that pile of shit with 10 copies of gta5 taped together and covered in feces...

ALL aaaa slop is dead to me... they will never see a dime from me ever again... no ea, no ubi, no rockstar... if they call themselves AAAA then it's trash.

[–] grandma@sh.itjust.works 8 points 14 hours ago

Pretty excited about gta6 myself but I'm not touching the online mode with a 10 foot pole. It probably won't even run on linux anyway

[–] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 4 points 14 hours ago
  • Isn't "overproduced" not an antonym of slop?
  • That you won't buy it won't make its (probable?) success less of a counterargument to this ceo's ramblings.
[–] minfapper@piefed.social 4 points 12 hours ago

Obligatory "Fuck Tim Sweeney!"