this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
89 points (97.8% liked)

politics

31060 readers
2786 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So, either Fauci was a terrible doctor and Trump was a giant idiot to keep him in place

OR

Fauci was good at his job, and Trump is a backstabber who turned on him.

Either way, it seems like Trump is the one who is terrible at his job.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago

Either way, it seems like Trump is the one who is terrible at his job.

Sound reasoning but his feelings don't care about your facts

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I don't need to read this to remember that Trump stood on stage and literally told people they were investigating using brilliant light and injecting disinfectant

His medical officer rolled her eyes in the background

He also insulted Biden for wearing a mask whilst his cabinet was promoting invermectin

His impact rebooted the cooker movement.

People look back like "covid wasn't that bad".. but, the reality is everyone has been somewhat exposed at this point or been vaccinated. Those same people would say the same about small pox after benefiting from herd immunity

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Over a million people died domestically, people really think it wasn't that bad?

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I'm in Australia, we have plenty of cookers who think it was fine (we did actually implement masking and social distancing here and have a really high vaccination rate, so the cookers think they just have super immune systems).

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Sigh. Why does everything have to have some Big Dark Conspiracy behind it?

Nearly everyone that barely graduated high school or just outright dropped out, seems to think that they have the "real story" behind something like Covid. Because they "did their own research".

These people usually don't even realize (Dunning-Kruger) that they simply don't have the skills to do that. That's why they did so poorly at school and why they didn't go on to - or finish - a higher degree, at least not in something more difficult to attain. They may not even have basic reading comprehension, probably have poor numeracy skills, and are not even aware of logical fallacies. The likelihood of them being auto-didactic is not very high.

It's exhausting.

And morons and bad faith actors like Gabbard feed into it, FFS.

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Because ridiculous conspiracy theories are the only way to thread the needle when you absolutely must ignore Occam's razor.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone -5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

At the same time there's a whole bunch of idiots running around thinking they know everything just because they paid the university tax and got a piece of paper

Imagine someone of average intelligence, then 50% of people are dumber than that and maybe 10% are functionally equivalently intelligent. Maybe 40% of the population are switched on, now throw in some politics and wildly different upbringing and life experience

[–] Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

So instead if investigating Fauci, they should investigate Gabbard - simple as that.

[–] dwemthy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tulsi Gabbard the cult asset?

[–] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 4 points 2 months ago

Or Tulsi Gabbard the Russian asset?

[–] flamingleg@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] garbagehead@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago

Running cover for the preferred narrative once again. Ugh.