this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
397 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

85736 readers
4464 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/electricvehicles/p/2162853/usa-slate-s-new-electric-truck-will-cost-slightly-more-than-24950

Range is said to be 205 mi (330 km), higher than the original estimate. This price is for the basic truck. The SUV configuration is expected to be $5000 more.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

FYI: it looks like slate has switched battery chemistry and suppliers. They will now be using LFP batteries. Cheaper, but they'll last longer. Especially if you charge them to 100% and discharge them below 15%.

An overall win, as there was a zero chance I would have bought one if they put the NMC batteries in it they were going to use.

There will no longer be battery options for a small 150 mile range battery or a bigger battery that would go around 240 miles, though. Now (due to LFP batteries not being as energy dense) there's only going to be one battery option that they claim will have a 205 mile range.

Unfortunately for me, this means I won't be getting one. I need to go 180 miles round trip between charges, and that's just cutting it way too close. Especially during winter time when the range would be reduced by quite a bit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bloogoose@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 days ago

The concept is a good one. The marketing and financial backing is bad. I think an affordable ev would be a good thing, but this is America.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (7 children)

My buildout went to $33,600 for fastback with roof rack and speakers

While that’s a lot more than base, it’s exactly what I want and it’s still a great price compared to any other EV available to me. The only thing it would really not be good at is road trips but I still have my model Y

But as a big and tall guy I would never buy a vehicle without trying it to see if it’s comfortable for me ….. and to see if I can remove the back seats and fit it out as a camper. (My brother is doing that with a sienna hybrid and he probably has the right idea: lack of range could be a problem if you want to camp for a week with no electric)

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You'd have to be a massive idiot to think buying into a Bezos led infrastructure won't nickle and dime them to death down the road....

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Tbh that kinda sounds like the point from the start. The price they give is the base-base. Like, an absolute barebones build. Any color you want as long as it's grey.

But making each individual add-on available...individually...is pretty damn sweet. And also making them available after-market...presumably in an easy-to-install method (kinda figure to be scalable it must be, otherwise the build-to-order model would flop at the assembly line), is icing on the cake.

It sucks that it's a Bezos initiative, otherwise I'd be yelling to shut up and take my money. A basic-ass EV two-seater that can handle light open loads is exactly what I want. And one that is (seemingly) user-servicable? Hell yeah. AND A FRUNK TO BOOT!

But if bezos is behind it, it's instantly sus. More sus than any other billionaire, save for a handful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Only 2 doors for the SUV is pretty wonky.

[–] prototonic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, Blazers and Broncos have been around forever as 2-door SUVs, not a big issue there

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ah, but todays full-sized husky American kids can't squeeze past the seats in a two-door.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

well it's not a minivan

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›