this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
249 points (98.8% liked)

politics

31071 readers
2873 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 78 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm super glad Ted Lieu has kept up this line of questioning to keep it in the media. Needs to be said.

[–] borkborkbork@piefed.social 14 points 2 months ago

Yep. They need to start taking down a list of names of officials that are obstructing the process of law, including trump's maladies. It's national security shit, not a popularity contest, and it's irresponsible for a national leader to play fuckaround with this kind of stuff, and the enablers must be held accountable for their parts.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This community's rule 1 ought to be amended to require posters to uncensor headlines. The White House Communications Director called a Congressman a "dumbass" and a "bitch." Not a "bi**h," a "bitch." And also stooped to some kindergartener-esque mangling of the Congressman's name from "Lieu" to "Lewd" while he was at it.

Readers -- especially American citizens -- should not be shielded from the full impact of that disgrace. Stop the sanewashing!

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It might be to combat the algorithms they are used to fighting against. These words get posts removed automatically almost everywhere but here.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is no such algorithm on lemmy. If you're interacting with a platform that forces self censorship like this...maybe don't.

Not directed at you specifically.

[–] 8uurg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is a replace filter on lemmy that replaces words in a configurable list with removed, though. I would argue there is some kind of algorithm for this present albeit visible rather than the invisible hiding of entire posts.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Yes, there probably is one in that regard. I meant that an algorithm doesn't curate your feed for engagement; you can sort posts in several ways but there is no tuned algorithm feeding you posts to keep you scrolling.

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 35 points 2 months ago (2 children)

These are some of the lamest insults I've ever heard. You can't even explain to someone how dumb they are, because you've already forgotten what they were.

Maybe ChatGPT should take Cheung's job.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Limited vocabulary can be a sign of mental illness.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Especially the mental illness known as dementia.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You can always tell it's Cheung just from the severely limited vocabulary. I don't think that guy made it out of fourth grade.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Cool. So Ole' Poopypants is going to keel over soon right?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Cheung only exists in this admin so headlines like this can be written about what he says.

He's literally just a fat troll whose job is to insult people.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 17 points 2 months ago
[–] homes@piefed.world 15 points 2 months ago

That’s what I call “winning”

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I take that massive anger in the reply as a confirmation. So he is right then?

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 7 points 2 months ago

I thought it was called “being alive”.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He’s one of the few democratic representatives this ain’t true of

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I love Ted. He's very quick, he's not shy, and gets right to the point.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Everybody has a terminal illness. It's called life. Last I checked, death still comes one to a customer. I guess Trump doesn't like being reminded of the fact that he's probably definitely going to Hell.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don’t believe in hell, but for dumpy, I’ll make an exception

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago
[–] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Well, the White House is the actual "bitch" and "dumbass" here.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I wonder if they will ever understand how their reactions let us know what is true. I hope not.

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I will never forgive the Trump voters.

They do not deserve the company of those who tried to warn them.

They are more concerned with satiating their egos than understanding the world or how government works… or anything else at all really.

They are pure ego and emotion. They don’t care about anything else.

They don’t care.

That is the problem.

In fact, I’d go so far as to say many of them don’t even understand why WE care, so much so that it makes them angry that we do.

The people who don’t experience empathy (psychopaths), or who can simply turn their empathy off (sociopaths)… are pissed.

They’re tired of the Information Age confronting them about their lack of humanity.

They want to be evil anonymously again, or at least to have the government make it feel similar.

Nobody wants to be confronted by journalists and activists while they’re destroying the environment and exploiting other human beings.

They’d prefer it if we gave them awards and monuments.