this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
103 points (100.0% liked)

memes

21691 readers
2486 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

41.5 C is 106.7 Freedom units. That's too hot. Yikes.

[–] homik@slrpnk.net 15 points 3 hours ago
[–] DevDave@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago

just need to hang on for a bit longer and when AMOC fails the heat waves will be a much lower priority! \s

[–] fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip 6 points 2 hours ago

i get to say this every year

but it's the coolest summer of the rest of our lives

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 hours ago

Random afd fanboy: "that's just summer"

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 4 hours ago

"Fun" fact: this heat wave already has a Wikipedia page that also shows of the 22 affected areas only four (Austria, Jersey, Slovakia and Slovenia) have not (yet) recorded a record high temperature.

[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Every year is a goddamn record. Follow @ZLabe@fediscience.org for more.

[–] thepig@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Not to be disrespectful to the Germans who are suffering, but maybe now they will not support coal power plants.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What support? Merz and Reiche don't count.

[–] thepig@lemmy.zip -5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Germany reopened coal mines cause it was too scared of alternatives like nuclear. To me that's like stabing yourself with a knife cause you are afraid of a bug bite

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago) (2 children)

To me, your take is completely uninformed, so allow me to enlighten you. When Russia attacked Ukraine, oil prices spiked and conservative media were trying to cause a panic that Germany hadn't enough natural gas to get through the winter. Tangent: The natural gas levels are much lower today than they ever were 2022, but because we now have a conservative government, conservative media doesn't care. Anyway, because the start of the Ukraine war was such a volatile time and to assuage any fears, the last government decided to give the last 3 operational nuclear power plants a 6 month extension and to bring back coal power plants as backup. And that is what they ever where. A backup. And building nuclear power takes decades and costs billions. They help neither in the short-, nor long-term.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 33 minutes ago (1 children)

Afaik after Fukushima they abandoned nuclear no?

After the March 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster and subsequent anti-nuclear protests, the government announced that it would close all of its nuclear power plants by 2022.[7][8] Eight of the 17 operating reactors in Germany were permanently shut down following Fukushima.

While nuclear power was gradually phased out of the German power mix, Germany increased its use of fossil fuel energy by 7% over the period 2002–2022, with a massive increase in usage of natural gas and only modest reductions of coal power and oil power.[9] By some estimates, Germany could have achieved a 73% reduction in its carbon emissions by retaining nuclear power during the period 2002–2022 and could have saved €696 billion on its energy transition.[9]

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 minutes ago

Yeah well, that's the conservative government for you. We could've just as easily transitioned from nuclear to renewables, which don't have the nuclear waste problem that is still unsolved. And Germany was for a brief time leading renewable energy innovation. But when the conservative government was faced with the cost of providing the infrastructure for this up-and-coming industry branch of the future, they instead cut all funding. This directly lead to the downfall of the German renewable sector ("Altmaier-Delle"). So while you are correct, when taking into account the entire time span from 2002, that Germany increased its reliance on coal and natural gas especially, it is incorrect to say that not sticking with nuclear was the sole reason for this. Betting on renewables was absolutely feasible even back then, as the current boom of renewables aptly demonstrates. But the conservatives do what conservatives do best: Stifle the future by fearing the up-front investment cost and sticking to the old and familiar instead of betting on the new and future-proof, even when the old way of doing this has already been shown to be unsustainable.

[–] Sailing7@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 hours ago

Username does not check out ^^

Very much detailed and to the point. Thanks for taking your time against false information matey ❀️

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That was 2023 to prevent an energy crisis triggered by the russian invasion in Ukraine and these coal plants (not mines!) were already shut down again.

And nuclear is not an alternative.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 1 points 13 minutes ago

nuclear is not a. Alternative

Only because your entire country was brainwashed by Russian propaganda in the '90s. Germany used to produce 25% of its power from nuclear. As far as I can tell, currently you produce none from nuclear and still 25% from coal and another 25% from natural gas.