this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
313 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

85815 readers
4054 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 hours ago

Not if it's not installed on my Linux laptop....

[–] vane@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago

Now do

Chrome can now suggest you files from your and your friends hard drives

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 20 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's things like this that got me to start looking at Librewolf.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago

I used to use WebKit based browsers like w3m and terminal based browsers like lynx. Also used a lot of terminal based apps for things, not really for security but because my netbooks single core atom chip sucked. I noticed though that I essentially avoided cookies, ads, and trackers by accident. I've been thinking of going back to a thermal based life. Now I'm wondering if there are terminal based apps for Lemmy and mastadon.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

The headline seems a little inflammatory. It requires the user to explicitly select a region to share.

Google is making Gemini a lot more aware of what's happening inside Chrome. The company has started rolling out a new "Select from screen" feature that lets users highlight specific text or images from a webpage and send them directly to Gemini, making conversations with the AI assistant far more contextual.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's baffling that over and over and over, every fucking time a corporation does this shit, there's someone willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I like to deal with facts and measured responses instead of being instantly reactionary 🤷

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 hours ago

Which is fair, but in the context of the day, and of our history, skepticism is appropriate

[–] plz1@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The fact that it can do it in the first place means it can do it at all. Just because they require the selection now, doesn't mean they aren't harvesting telemetry 24/7, and won't "accidentally" enable this feature later.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Or just lie to you it’s not on, they have zero reason to not run this 24/7 they will not be caught

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

No, it can definitely read the entire browser window, fill out and click through forms etc etc. i know, I’ve used it.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

That might be true, but it sounds like like a completely different feature than what the article is discussing. This is talking about a new feature that requires the user to select a specific section of the page in order to make it visible to the I'm LLM.

I am a little confused though, as to why this new feature would be needed if it could already read the entire screen.

[–] covert_llm@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago

cant tell if serious

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 23 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Anyone still using Chrome deserves it

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 26 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe innocent people who aren’t as technically literate as you that also happen to be using Chrome don’t deserve for their rights to be infringed upon? If that’s an unpopular thought then so be it I suppose.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago

That's true.

Anyone in this community that is still using Chrome definitely deserves it, though.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 32 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Every day, I grow happier for having ditched Google's version of Android for GrapheneOS.

[–] Batmorous@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Worldwide we need to all build up GrapheneOS to be the new default for all of us

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Meh. It's still mainly backed by Google in the end. I'd rather coalesce around mobile Linux. It's not ready yet but that's far preferable.

[–] mild_deviation@programming.dev 2 points 9 hours ago

I keep hoping for the 10 Fold to go on sale again, but with component prices being the way they are, I don’t think it’s going to happen for me. Will wait and see how it shakes out for the 11, and if it’s still too bonkers, settle for a used 10.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 115 points 1 day ago (1 children)

and while we had constant outrage from Recall, I assume we'll hear nothing about this from people

[–] artyom@piefed.social 13 points 23 hours ago

Seeing your screen when prompted is not the same as recording your screen

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I get increasingly jaded with every bit of news that basically says "yet another reason to not use Google, integrated/agentic AI etc." When will it be enough to make even IT-illiterates consider?

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

I mean people still use MicroSlop everyday, so I don't think there will 'ever' be a time.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net -1 points 13 hours ago

I stopped worrying about IT illiterates long ago... Same reason I don't want the masses flocking to Linux. They'll find a way to ruin it.

[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Gemini is already creeping me out with all the personal information Google is injecting into the AI context. So far I've seen my name, location and if I remember right, which vehicle I drive. Who knows what else is in there. I use DDG whenever I can, but sometimes a Google search is the only way to actually find something, so I see the Gemini junk as I'm scrolling down.

Is there any way to have that info deleted and no longer collected or used by Google? Or is that kind of thing only for the lucky people in Europe?

EDIT: Found it here: https://myactivity.google.com/product/gemini?hl=en-US

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Oh no!

What ever will they do without my data!?

[–] MBM@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If you really want to use Google but without the Gemini junk, &udm=14 is your friend

[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago

Thanks! I think I prefer startpage.com (which I only just learned about due to this thread) because it doesn't redirect to google.com. But this is also good to know about just in case.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can use startpage. It just proxies your searches to google, so you get the same results as a direct google search. I think you can also use !g on DDG.

[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I'll have to try out !g, thanks a lot!

EDIT: Tried it and it just redirected to google.com. I was hoping it would have kept me on DDG for privacy and just presented a first page of results or something like that.

EDIT 2: Startpage is great! This will be my go-to when DDG doesn't work out.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (5 children)

I use DDG whenever I can, but sometimes a Google search is the only way to actually find something

Do you have an example of something you had to use Google for because you couldn't find it with DDG?

Edited to add, four replies later and no specific examples. I am not trying to shill for DDG or anything here, I'm trying to get real, specific examples.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago

DDG's search is pretty bad

[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I’m trying to get real, specific examples.

Asking for unnecessary specifics and details is usually a sign not that the person wants to be helpful but that they disagree and are looking for ammunition to argue and feel superior. Ultimately the exchange becomes a waste of everyone's time, as the person inevitably becomes rude, condescending and argumentative. Basically, some people online think they're smarter than everyone else, or at least want to project that. They believe they have the only valid argument and they're going to prove it to the world and probably think that they've won because they had the last word when in reality everyone left because they realized the person was not arguing in good faith. I'm not claiming you're that type of person, but I suspect that's why nobody is giving you specifics.

Wouldn't have mentioned anything but you did ask.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't see how it's unnecessary to get more details about why something wasn't working for them.

I also hate that everything online is considered an argument these days. No one just has conversations. Lemmy and reddit don't help in that regard with up and downvotes encouraging group think.

Anyway, this is a huge tangent and not on topic, my bad.

[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

I agree with you that online conversations are rare these days. Just my personal opinion but social media isn't usually great for conversations. It's better for shallow comments, drive-by's, and echo chambers. Social media also tends to steer toward blind comments, so there is a lot of repetition. Forums seem to be better for conversations because there's often a emphasis on reading the entire thread before commenting, there is more moderation, and also because they tend to accrue replies more slowly. However if a thread becomes too long then forums break down too, so nothing is perfect.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Not OP, but its true. There have been times I've searched and tweaked like 7 times. Go to google with my original text and its the first link. This is not common though.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 7 hours ago

I'm really curious where things fall short for people. I haven't used Google for years at this point, and I don't miss it.

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

I tried switching to ddg several times over the last decade or so and always gave up because of issues like this, especially with technical or obscure topics. Recently started paying for Kagi and do not have the same issues at all there. The results are good and nicely presented without ads. Of course, on the flip side it’s pretty expensive.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 21 hours ago

For me, I !g sometimes when I'm searching for specific gifs, and DDG isn't getting me the results I need. For the most part, that's it.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shiny reflective metal that blinds you to what's behind it.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 3 points 18 hours ago

Ah, thanks 👍

[–] 404found@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not that big of a deal. I'm pretty sure Gemini has strabismus.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

How can it do that if I never installed it? Is it looking over my shoulder or something?

[–] adhdsergio@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

Using a Palantir