WhoIzDisIz

joined 1 week ago
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

"It's a trap!" Admiral Ackbar

I'm not interested in debate of this topic, as virtually every time I have engaged in such in the past it's quickly become obvious that the other person was not engaging in good faith with an open mind.

There is plenty of information to be found from all sides on the topic on the net, and if you're truly interested you should invest the time to look it over with a skeptical eye while knowing there's a good amount of propaganda from both sides. You'll have to figure out which sources are most trustworthy, and factual in their reporting - although even the more biased sources often make good points to be considered. Then compare and contrast stories to find the essential facts that are most likely to actually be true and go from there.

Good luck.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Regarding spoiling the fun, were this a world without enshitification and/or corporate malfeasance that might be a good consideration. For the world we currently actually DO live in, my initial reaction is usually one of mistrust - and I strongly suspect I'm far from alone in that.

As such, I normally might've not ventured forth with exploring your offering, but instead waited for someone to give me more of an idea what I was walking into before potentiality giving out information I didn't want to inadvertently. However, at the moment I came across your post I guess I was feeling gregarious enough (and less concerned with this identity since I've only recently created it) to toss my normal inhibitions aside, and share the kind of info I myself would have been wanting to see before taking the risk.

TL;DR: There are an number of psychological factors at play here as well as real-world concerns, so IMHO the more up-front you are in letting potential users know what to expect, the more comfortable they'll be with giving it a shot. They'll also be better informed about what to look for in features they might not have otherwise discovered with a quick spin.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Last I knew, Opera was owned by a Chinese company. I don't have a problem with the Chinese people, but their onerous government gives me pause. I don't want to contribute to them financially any more than I absolutely have to (considering it's virtually impossible to buy much of anything nowadays that doesn't have their hooks in it outside of food - and there's probably even something I'm missing there).

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Isn't teletherapy the same? It can work IF done right (and, yes - that's a BIG "if").

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

Ironic: I think the idea is to indicate how open you feel at that moment to being social. I get how doing that without actually socializing seems ironic, but I can also see how this would help avoid social interactions going needlessly bad because one participant just wasn't in the right mood.

I have strong doubts about people keeping this up to date, however. I could see it being used as a kind of S.O.S. by someone who needs some support, but doesn't want to impose on others who might not be up for providing it.

You're absolutely right about the lack of integration into other platforms that actually facilitate that socialization, however.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Quick intro for those wondering how it works:

  1. It does ask for an email first thing, but it's presented as just an optional backup for your account.

  2. Then comes the explanation I was looking for in my other comment.

Your Social Battery - Drag the dial to set how social you're feeling — from drained to fully charged. Your friends see this in real time.

Share Your Invite Link - Tap "Share your link" and send it to friends. When they join via your link you're connected automatically. https: //socialbattery. space/?ref={username}

See Friends' Levels - Once connected, you both appear in each other's friends list with live battery updates.

Then you're plopped on this screen:

Settings lets you select a profile picture, nickname (so you can show your real or gamer name presumably, but since your username is part of the link you share it doesn't do anything for security or privacy), and light or dark mode. ETA: I think the nickname feature should also be on a per-friend level, not global.

I think that should be sufficient to give people an idea what to expect when deciding whether to give it a try.

ETA: I am curious what happens when you don't have the PWA open. Do your friends just perpetually see what you last selected, or is there a timeout where it'll just say "offline" (and what is that timeout)?

I've made several edits/additions to this throughout, so you may want to scan it for those if you've already read this.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Would be nice if your mention of the site was actually a link, although I'll admit I'm just scrolling through "all" and have no idea if that's against the rules in this community (which would seem silly if a self-promoting post was allowed to begin with).

ETA: some explanation, and/or demo of how it actually works in practice would also be helpful so we can decide whether we want to invest the time.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As much as I dislike them when all things are equal, that's not the case in this world. Canada needs to change their attitude on this a bit because absurdly large punishments are one of the only ways to deter absurdly large corporations from bad behavior. Maybe punishments need to be scaled according to relative revenue of the offender.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Exactly. I can't believe he's going for such peanuts, especially after reading all the other crap that they associated him with.

Ashley MacIsaac, a three-time Juno award-winning musician, filed the claim in the Ontario superior court of justice, asserting that Google was liable for the “foreseeable republication” of its AI-generated Overview feature, which previously published defamatory claims that he had been convicted of multiple criminal offences, including the sexual assault of a woman, internet luring involving a child with the intention of sexual assaulting the child, and assault causing bodily harm.

≥Google’s AI Overview also wrongly stated that MacIsaac had been listed on the national sex offender registry for life, the lawsuit says.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 15 points 2 days ago

He put on a pretty good front up until his stroke right before the primary. It's debatable whether what he has become since is who he was all along, but he definitely won for more reasons than merely not being Oz, the carpetbagger.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago

This is no surprise coming from a pawn shop owner - one grifter envious of the biggest grifter in recent memory.

view more: next ›