this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
365 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

85815 readers
3488 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 15 points 3 hours ago

Samsung and price fixing. Name a more iconic duo.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 12 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Fuck 'em I'll make my own RAM factory and it'll have hookers and blackjack.

Maybe a bit of coke.

[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 5 points 1 hour ago

In fact, forget the RAM!

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 116 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They been publicly fixing the supply for 30 fucking years.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 92 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

people's memory is volatile and needs constant refreshing

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 26 points 5 hours ago

Nice one :D

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

A solid chance for memory maker to win.

When you get a better offer from someone else, it's not price fixing, but business

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 42 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

It's a class action submitted by few consumers. Will see how this goes, but I highly doubt it's like before where they were literally keeping ram away from markets to inflate the prices, otherwise commitments on building more fabs seem weird if they'd want maximum return, but now they're taking risks since it's quite unclear if the AI demand will stay like this in the future.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 50 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The fact that they're making companies sign 5-year contracts for the current prices before selling anything at all says that they're expecting the demand to collapse soon, and they want to lock in the high prices before that happens.

When industries pull this bullshit, they should be nationalized.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 22 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This. You would never do this if you thought prices would go up each year for the foreseeable future.

I didn't think of it that way... but yeah that makes sense. They obviously think this is the top of the market and it can only go down. Why else would you force major brands to lock in here?

[–] EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app 6 points 4 hours ago

If only any governments had any appetite for enforcing anti-price fixing laws

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 hours ago

Like every industry does, and gets away with it if they keep it looking competitive.

[–] Truthtwopower@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 hours ago

Giant Corporation going to Giant Corporation get out of here what

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago