this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
1083 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

86580 readers
3946 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

At this point, just build the data centers on another planet or on another moon

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Those only solve for gravity, or not having to pay for fuel to keep things in orbit. Other heavenly bodies are further away, so latency becomes a big problem, followed by exponentially more power to transmit (radio) in order to maintain the same bandwidth. That and cooling: the possible candidates range from as bad as orbit to worse and much worse, all with increasing latency and power needs to boot.

Overall, even the in-orbit version is a bad idea.

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

We could be launching solar panels into space that beam down radiation to make power more plentiful and cheap, but nah we but a complex data center that needs maintenance and complex parts

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›