this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
85 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

86480 readers
3325 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 28 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

And where do they get the hydrogen???

Fossil fuel... But you really have to dig to find where they admit it.
Last time this came up it was buried in the documentation about how wind and solar don't provide enough.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

In all fairness hydrogen is good battery store for green energy too.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

This is exactly what I was thinking.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 17 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I sense a big kaboom in this train’s future.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No specialist or anything, but I imagine most of the kaboom potential is puncture-based. I don't expect much to make it to the heart of a train as trains generally win in collisions.

Pressure vessel fatigue is possible too, but generally rated and tested well above pressure relief valves.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Depends on how you define "win". It only takes one small hydrogen leak for a catastrophe. A train will wreck any car or truck for sure, hit or miss with another train, but even a simple derailment of tanker cars often results in a significant mess.

There are nuclear rail transport containers that have been tested in collisions, and they've never leaked, but they're very big and heavy for not a whole lot of volume. And they're sealed, while a fuel tank needs holes to let fuel in and out.

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

Luckily hydrogen floats upwards pretty quickly. So paradoxically, storage tanks are safer the less protection they have around them. Or at least, above them.

[–] newton@feddit.online 3 points 20 hours ago

Yes Rico,kaboum