People Twitter

10213 readers

1513 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

329

The beard (feddit.dk)

submitted 5 hours ago by stenAanden@feddit.dk to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

77 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 2) 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Instagram has set some astronomical standards, especially for women.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It was because of this image I purchased the game.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 hours ago (7 children)

I still want to, if I ever get enough "fuck you money" to buy a ps5

[–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

Isn't it on steam now?

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net -1 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

I mean yes, but also is that really detail we need in a game? I would rather have better performance tbh.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] silver_wings_of_morning@feddit.dk 1 points 4 hours ago

DEI chins and now woman BEARDS smh my head

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works -3 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Ragebait.

Anyone capable of zooming in on an image and using an ellipse tool on it isn't that dumb.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Never doubt the determination of a G*mer to hate on women.

load more comments (2 replies)

[+] ceenote@lemmy.world -8 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Less "Why do women have hair" and more "Why are developers spending time and money on peach fuzz when game development is already too expensive?"

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe -5 points 4 hours ago (10 children)

I've always seen the argument coming from incels who want their game women to look like anime, but this is the first realistic take on it.

Yeah, i don't want to spend money on a new graphics card because some artistic vision includes peach fuzz. Realism in video games has met a new point where, we dont want to spend money on seeing more realism.

Like it's cool to see some realistic hair but i dont want to smell Geralt's unwashed anus when i havent visited a bath house in a while. I cant speak for everyone, but realism isnt always necessary or better.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

Part of the problem is everyone is on UE5 and UE5 does everything for you, which means the art of designing a game engine to efficiently do exactly what you want it to do for your unique game is a dead art. True innovation in game design is gone, so all you have are massive budgets trying to push as many photorealistic details down a standardized pipeline as possible to make a game look AAA.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 3 hours ago

Looks at GTA VI hype

load more comments (8 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments