this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
321 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7560 readers
2445 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A professor used white font to hide instructions to throw off students using an AI chatbot to cheat on their midterm.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 hours ago

Imagine....they didn't. Even. Read it.

They deserve the failure grade

[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 25 points 3 hours ago (7 children)

That's why university evaluations should be always in pen and paper.

this is just unacceptable, those students should be just expelled without mercy IMO.

[–] onnekas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

Or at least give students computers that have restricted or no access to the internet? Even before LLMs having access to the internet would have been a huge opportunity to cheat. At least in most subjects.

Also, what happened to teachers/supervisors walking around and checking if the students cheat? Back when I went to school we also cheated with cheat sheets or exchanging answers but it was always risky because getting busted meant failing the test (or worse).

Letting students use the internet unrestrictedly would be like the teacher leaving the room and letting us unsupervised for the duration of the test back in my days.

[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 1 points 6 minutes ago

could be... they made me programa python on paper.

for introduction to programming, basically you had to try to run the program on your head lmao.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] soratoyuki@piefed.zip 27 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Are cheating and plagiarism no longer grounds for immediate expulsion...?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 53 minutes ago

Universities don't teach students out of a sense of duty and honor.

Students are their funding. Failing these 32 students could cost the school millions.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The upper management of high schools are generally the kinda people who'd say "it's not cheating, it's just a tool"

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 54 minutes ago

My experience with high school is that they would want you to cheat so the school's numbers look good. The consequences of No Child Left Behind will be felt for a long time.

[–] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, if the AI never explains to them what cheating is, can they even be blamed?

This all sounds like no one is holding the students accountable at all, which means they're not being educated, they're being babysat.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 4 points 1 hour ago

which means they’re not being educated

On the contrary. They got the lesson loud and clear: if you cheat your way through life and you get caught, if you're loaded, there are no consequences.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 24 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

32 out of 35.

That tracks. I hate over 90% of people

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago* (last edited 29 minutes ago)

Good on the three people who wasn't caught, either because the don't use AI or because they at least read the question and the llm output. And gold star if any of them noticed the white text but didn't tell the rest of the students!

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Wow this gen is pathetic. 0 tech literacy

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

been that way for almost two decades.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago)

Since smart phones and Chromebooks really.

[–] mynameisbob@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 hours ago

Lazy shits.... good. It means the teacher cares. Lucky

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Gibson shared some of the most examples in a follow-up video.

The most examply of examples, presumable?

If you're just rehashing someone else's video for your "article" can't you at least check your language?

[–] Janx@piefed.social 1 points 13 minutes ago

They're the examplest!

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 24 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

At least you know it was written by a human 🙂 I honestly welcome dumb spelling and grammar mistakes nowadays - and I never thought I'd ever say that - as a sign that I'm probably not reading slop.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Soon the slop will just start dropping words and making typos because it’s learned that’s what we prefer.

[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yroure absolooply write.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yeah I too believe this will happen some day. The key to spreading AI seems to be tricking people into interacting with it.

But for now, it seems LLMs are still totally focused on talking like marketdroids or salesmen you wouldn't lend your wallet to.

load more comments
view more: next ›