this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
364 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12197 readers
336 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's Shopify's Tobi Lutke.

A reminder that he's behind Build Canada and Build Toronto, and that Build Toronto's Eric Lombardi is running for the Ontario Librral Party leadership as we speak.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 days ago

Billionaire people shouldn't be able to vote.

They have power through capital already, they don't need more.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 7 points 3 days ago

It used to be that only property owners could vote. The laws all favoured the property owners.

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Why is everyone that has worked on Ruby on Rails a total and utter douchebag? should be studied how that one project seems to have spawned some of the biggest bigoted asshole douches in the tech industry.

Lutke is a moron just like DHH is a moron and surprise surprise they're both from RoR.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Obligatory reminder that the inventor of Javascript is a homophobe and a crypto scammer. We never needed it! Download NoScript today!

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 5 points 3 days ago

Maybe naming projects based on expensive pebbles attracts people with an affinity for signs of wealth?

[–] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Under fire? Put him in the fire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago

"Poors under fire for thinking that killing billionaires should be legal".

[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I do understand the frustration with the fact that people who are working have less time to be politically active than retirees, but I don't really see any way around it. The flip side is that a lot of great volunteers retire into community service and have a lot of extra time to help the community because they no longer work.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Doing political things, like attending town hall meetings or party fundraisers, could count for tax rebates like donations do, and a certain amount of days off work each year could be required to be available for such things.

Election days could be national holidays, and local election days local holidays.

If being poor or being required to work is really that much of an issue, I'm sure a billionaire could afford 60k UBI for ten thousand people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago

This is the same company that simps for PP and MAGA

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

under fire

Oh?

figuratively

Oh.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Every single billionaire admits they've been lucky. They aren't special, they're just lucky to have more than their fair share.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's not my experience. I've only ever heard them claim that they worked hard to get what they have. Admitting that luck was involved would mean they don't deserve to be that wealthy, and they would never admit that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wraekscadu@vargar.org 4 points 3 days ago

He should be on fire, not "under fire".

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Assuming Tobi Lutke makes at least 8% roi on his investments, he could give every homeless person in canada 20grand a year using just the interest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ProudCanadianCitizen@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Better idea - only the middle class can vote.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (9 children)

The middle class already decides most elections because politicians target the middle class as a voting bloc.

This is why housing prices always seem to trend up: middle class wealth is concentrated in their family home.

This is also why there’s so much government funding for universities (public universities). The middle class disproportionately benefit from it. Taxes on working class people to pay for higher education that their own children don’t benefit from are regressive taxes. Basically a wealth transfer from the working class to the middle class.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They may determine the outcome of elections, but they don't determine what outcomes the outcome chases. That's the lobbyists

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The outcomes are what favour them though.

People who have a good job, plenty of vacation days, 2 cars, own their own home, couple of kids, money saved for school and retirement… these folks are not all that upset about billionaires.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago

They keep talking like that and “the poors” might have to do something about it. There’s a historical precedent. At the end of the day there a lot more of us than there will ever be of them.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Classism is usually brought up as a word when identity politics writers want to pay lip service to it. But this is classism.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›