Back in my day, YouTube had a 5-star rating system
this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
1042 points (97.7% liked)
memes
22211 readers
4155 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
And the video's rating was plainly visible so you could use it to make the decision whether the video was even worth your click.
The shovelware AI slop video channels wouldn't be such a problem today if we still had that.
Going straight to YouTube is like going straight to Imgur looking for good content. Should never be done. Places like Lemmy or friend chat groups refer me to good videos. Or my curated subscribed channels with quality content is the other way I watch youtube.
Anyone going straight to YouTube.com looking for their algorithm and ratings system to tell them about shit content in advance is mistaken in their expectations.
extensive use of the "Don't recommend this video > Tell us why > I don't like this video" function, plus removing bad videos from my watch history after I stop watching, has got me a well-trained slop-free recommendations page with interesting new smallish channels.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Usually I go there looking for something specific and use the search bar.
However, the search function in YouTube has also turned to absolute crap. It only lists a few results and then switches to random shit you didn't ask for.
A lot of the results are also often misleading titles leading to lazy videos that are a slideshow of impertinent pictures with a synthetized voice spewing inaccurate information. AI has made that even worse. The star rating system would have helped identify these crap videos before you click on them.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
and search results showed only videos related to your search. recommendations on the side were similar videos and not some unrelated bullshit. it was so much better.
Honestly if someone remade an old YouTube alternative I think it would take off.
It’s what I wish PeerTube was, but I’m not sure if that will ever take off sadly.
Lack of advertising dollars is definitely an impediment to video platform alternatives…
I remember a time when people just posted silly little shitty drawn videos just for the fun of it. Not saying creators shouldn’t be compensated for their hard work, I just feel like something was lost with the monetization of every little thing.
The trouble is hosting that much video content and the bandwidth to feed viewers.
People really fail to understand what a truly colossal undertaking a site like YouTube is. It's a technological wonder that they are able to process that much data and serve it so efficiently. Hate YouTube all you want, I do, but the engineers at Google are fucking magicians.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
google is absolute worst
Makes me wonder if under the hood it's still stored as stars or if they migrated their data. Is a 3 star or more rating displayed as thumbs up now? Is a thumbs up just a 5 star rating? When thumbs down existed was that just 1 star?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Back in my day, memes weren't Ai "enhanced" and Bart didn't have a vagina for an ear.
What is going on with that vaginear anyway? And the random grass rectangle.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Hey man, they're raggin' on your vaginear!
You sweet summer child, back in my day YouTube had a five star rating system and video response functionality.
Gotta say, don't miss video responses. It was nearly all irrelevant content and people trying to advertise their own channels
load more comments
(2 replies)
no one uses the return YouTube dislikes browser extension?
I don’t want my watchlist stored on a random third party server
What's the point, if downvotes are no longer a factor in the YT backend?
To save you time avoiding a bad instructional video.
It's a good enough approximation. Do you really need to know if the massively downvoted video had 357,923 downvotes or 357,924?
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
It still does, it just doesn't show numbers because YouTube is a coward.
No the API is dead. The extension everyone is using calculates their own dislike number by inferring from the extension users who disliked the video
load more comments
(9 replies)
They already removed it from Shorts. Give it a little time and it will be gone from the rest of the videos.
Not like you need another reason to not watch shorts.
All I want these days is a "Don't show me any fucking AI slop" setting and a button to report AI slop.
Tidal has a no-AI button, if it helps. They've just introduced it. That's music taken care of, I guess. It's something.
YouTube is letting people mark their videos as AI or not AI and I assume doing nothing with it? I think I've stumbled upon an AI video or two on YouTube but I didn't see any labels?
EDIT: Oh, fuck, are they just asking us to label our videos "non-AI" so they don't train their own AI on AI slop? Fuck.
load more comments
(1 replies)
back in my day, you posted about your life in your geocities website! And you wrote the html on notepad and had to include an animated gif that told people to email you, cause that was the style at the time.
Eh, back when GeoCities was still a thing, most people were too busy actually having a life to regularly post about it online. Since this was before smartphones, updating a social media profile was a lot more complicated and time-consuming.
Having an active social media profile back then was often a red flag that a person was more “talk” than “walk“.
load more comments
(6 replies)
And this meme wasn't AI upscaled
Ah, I remember when you paused and the whole video was buffering. You could have multiple tabs open and watch the video when it was done. No matter what kind of connection you had, you could simply wait for the video to finish downloading in the background and watch it without problems.
No ads, a 5-star rating system, 100% buffering, and mostly enthusiasts posting, no profit-driven incentives. We didn't know how good we had it.
I hate the way YouTube now gives millions of dollars to people exploiting children watching videos - be it slop factories or 'influencer' preying on their insecurities.
In a just society YouTube would have been destroyed as a pseudo-monopoly ages ago.
load more comments
(1 replies)
We're all being punished because Google's feelings got hurt when we didn't like the 2018 YouTube Rewind enough. That was the end of the dislike button and the YouTube Rewind altogether.
Back in my day, you could customize your YouTube profile and PM anyone on the platform
I miss being able to tell people they suck with just one click
The dislikes were great at telling me quickly if a tutorial was good or not.
Now you generally have to check the top comments to see if there's something wrong about the tutorial, but then YouTube started hiding those comments below ads/recommendations.
Now I just use GrayJay and I can quickly check comments for any video.
Return youtube dislike extension.
I've never blocked as many channels as now after they removed the dislike button on the shorts section.
It still has for me.
Yes, but actually no.
2 things:
- Dislike button itself not "wired' to any visible/meaningful count and only seen by video author (which is funny, cause whole point of hiding dislike count was promoted as "beneficial to mental health of channel owners")
- If you using youtube dislikes — it replaces that button with it's own, counts presses on its own and uses own logic to show "approximate" amount of dislikes on video: it's not like it knows real count, what I'm trying to say
load more comments
(1 replies)
What pushed me to use revanced some years ago.
view more: next ›