this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
79 points (95.4% liked)

politics

31093 readers
2219 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Trump has made more money while in office than most of us can even conceive of. In 2025, he took in more than $2.2 billion, according to financial disclosures that we’ve been parsing here at The New York Times.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Another fucking dumb headline. The real question is whether all the criminals will ever be held accountable. Not that I'm optimistic in that regard.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The President is only accountable to half the US House and 1/3 of US Senators. As long as 218 House members back him, he won't get impeached. And even failing that, as long as 34 Senators back him, he won't get punished.

It turns out he has enough support within Congress to keep grifting. Is he giving them a cut?

[–] sage@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

He's giving them everything they ever wanted.

It's a death cult after all.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

"Is crime still illegal for rich republikans?"

No sense clicking the clickbait. The answer is no.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago
[–] TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He might be rich, but he shits shis pants, can't sleep, is physically in a state, his mind is addled, his wife hates him, everyone close to him can't stand to be so. He's in his own little private hell.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

There is no amount of suffering that could make up for what he has done. That said, I'd like to see that theory tested. I would love to be proven wrong.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

He’s ancient and in failing health, near death. Yet his narcissism, his greed, his corruption are stronger than ever. What possible use could he have for the billions of dollars he’s defrauding us? ….. but a grifter is going to grift.

I’ve somewhat given up, in that he’s shown a talent for staying beyond the law and has millions of groveling sycophants: he’s unlikely to ever be held accountable for his crimes in his time remaining. But his minions can. His children can. His legions of cult followers can.

When our psychotic breakdown is over, will we have the honesty to hold them criminally liable?

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 7 points 1 month ago

Most Republicans value in-group solidarity more than things like justice or truth. So no, not unless Trump somehow becomes out-group.

Maybe if we start a conspiracy that he's actually Jewish... No, that's like trying to use The One Ring.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Probably not.

The same dipshits that think Pedolf Shitler is a Bigly Good At Bidness Guy, and think him cheating on his taxes is a good thing, also think he's just great at making money because he's their favorite con man and they have no clue that he's conning them, too. They probably all cheer when they hear how much the Rapist-in-Chief made, in many cases, directly taking money from his supporters.

[–] FluidBeef@quokk.au 2 points 1 month ago

No. People in that country have repeatedly shown at the ballot box that corruption is not a deal-breaker.