this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
545 points (99.6% liked)

politics

30600 readers
2424 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 22 points 1 day ago (22 children)

I wish there was an option for Social Democrat, because that's what fits me. Bernie made Democratic Socialism famous but I don't think most people who define themselves this way understand the difference.

[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I mean, Americans can just look at Europe. It's basically entirely social democracy. I don't understand why entire America is pretending social democracy is some sort of socialist boogeyman...

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This sounds like the same kind of splitting hairs that results in fighting between “leftists” and “liberals”. As long as we continue to bicker and come up with all of these ridiculous purity tests then we’re never going to defeat the right.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The function of the DSA, although they may seem extremist to you, is to pull the Overton window back to the left, where it was before virulent McCarthyism. Watch and learn.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

MAGA successfully took over a major political party. It's our turn now!

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 4 points 20 hours ago

Those in the 2000s saw the Tea party as the start of this fascist bullshit.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

MAGA has a president. DSA has a mayor...

[–] JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 21 hours ago

Its better if the movement is decentralized, Trump will croak some day and MAGA will have to pivot or collapse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works -4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

If the DSA did more than attack liberals I might be inclined to think this is a good thing, but so far they can't win in any district that isn't overwhelmingly blue. Not sure how they're going to beat back conservatives.

Idk, I think the DSA is only going to succeed in fracturing the Dems. We'll see.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

So you're telling me that a third of democrats now support open borders and public control of large corporations?

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure those are the two basic pillars of DSA. Well, in fact, they are not. But I was being polite.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Probably more than that. What we've got is a third of democrats who would accept a DSA member implementing those policies, rather than waiting for a Hillary or Obama to get 99 1/2 votes in the Senate before passing the "Deregulate immigration slightly and maybe consider a public option for large utilities Act of 2052"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 15 points 1 day ago (9 children)

A THIRD of our Base Identifies as THAT! OBVIOUSLY the Path to VICTORY is to WIN over ~~them!~~ the ZERO Percent of our Base who are MAGA!

-The DNC!

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 3 points 20 hours ago

That's it? I really expected it to be more. I now suspect that might be an over inflation or misunderstanding

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Here's the poll: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/28524353-cnn-july-poll-conducted-by-ssrs-midterms-parties/

How are they drawing the conclusion that "A third of Democrats now identify as democratic socialists" from that?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, what's 1/3 of like ten people?

Who actually identifies as Democrats? The majority of the US population is wayy too progressive to identify as a Democrat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago

This is just them pivoting because they know they need to rejuvenate the party

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago

Turns out they always did, they just didn’t realize their views aligned that way.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›