this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
51 points (93.2% liked)

Fuck AI

7560 readers
773 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/46135417

Good to see a big social media company push back against the insanity for once.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I am 100% convinced that this is only going to be used to train their bots to be more convincing

[–] TheAntiAiLeader@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That’s intriguing. Can you elaborate?

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 3 days ago

Smarter people than me can do it better, but imagine a simple a/b test. 10 videos, 5 with settings A 5 with settings B, give all a [statistics] amount of views. One set gets more slop flags than the other. Tweak settings/model and repeat until they don't get flagged anymore.

[–] ell1e@leminal.space 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I don't believe for a second YouTube didn't try to intentionally push slop, hoping users would be satisfied so that they could cut out human creators. I bet the only reason they're now backtracking is that people hate it.

[–] TheAntiAiLeader@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

YouTube has always tried to ‘push the boundaries’ but can never handle when the boundaries push back somehow. Not to mention they are likely utilising AI in their crappy algorithm

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not to mention they are likely utilising AI in their crappy algorithm

I mean, they always have. YouTube's whole job is to get you to watch more YouTube. It sees you watched video A so now it trys to figure out what else you might like to watch next so it suggests video B based on your interests and watching patterns. What the algorithm specifically prioritizes has changed a few times, which is why there's been fads in the algorithm. But determining what is something you'd be interested in isn't something that's easy to put directly into code, but something that can "vibe" it out is a much better tool to use. Its actually one of the better use cases for AI (AI in broad terms not specifically LLMs or other generative slop currently on everyone's shit list).

Not when it first started they didn’t. In the noughties, when YouTube stopped being a dating site and started being a video-sharing site, the algorithm was pretty simple: first upload, first serve effectively. It’s only over 2 decades that meddling fingers have bastardised that poor site with AI and sloppy algorithms that churn up the muck and put crap in your feed

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Tech bros insist people cant tell, the rest of the world is like, dude we can tell and hate it.

[–] ptsdstillinmymind@lemmy.today 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

AI is grift all the way around and it's stupid. The only people you love AI are the idiots because it makes them feel smart.

They really shouldn’t. If you have to depend on an alleged ‘intelligent’ computer program to tell you even basic things like what to do every day, you’re doing something wrong.