this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
22 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7560 readers
1584 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Microsoft has claimed that something like 30% of the code for Windows is AI-generated. (I have not verified that they even said that, maybe that's totally fake.) Last i checked AI-generated stuff cannot be copyrighted. Does this mean that significant portions of Windows are un-copyrightable, and MacroSlop couldn't do a damn thing if someone leaked those parts?

And then, reservations about including slop in a software project aside, what could this mean for things like ReactOS? They've been careful to avoid including any MS-owned code, but nobody owns slop code.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 2 points 18 minutes ago

There's still someone mapping out the features, designs etc b4 the AI goes to create it. Also saying 30% of code was AI generated hides cost of making the correct input: Planning, already existing code, Testing & Feedback loop, Reviewing. Its like saying Roofers aren't needed because 100% of nails were done with a nailgun.

Some tasks are easy with AI, others aren't but even when the code itself was 100% autonomous AI generated, the features, design was mapped out by someone is probably sufficient to retain copyright.

An image created by a five word prompt does not have a creative depth in creation like an image created by AI but with many refinement steps to get something truly unique.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 27 minutes ago

Rules are enforced differently for corporations than they are for the rest of us.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 minutes ago

Even if it's not copyright eligible, they still don't have any obligations to release the sources

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 31 minutes ago* (last edited 31 minutes ago)

They're probably safe until some governmental organization builds up enough motivation and money to try and investigate it. And given the reaming they gave the IRS I doubt anyone is up for it.

Beyond that, I can't imagine the sheer legal nightmare it would be, given that MS will hire the best fucking lawyers money can buy. How do you quantify how much is AI generated and how much isn't? How much involvement of AI makes it "AI code"? You could spend years in court arguing about where that particular line is.

It's a fun hypothetical, but unlikely to matter to any real degree, at least for a company their size. Maybe it could be used against some startup making dumb public statements.