this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
829 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

86860 readers
3613 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DudeWhoYapsTooMuch@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Wait wait wait, you mean the one place that literally shows the commentary of how unions actually do work, and show all of the evidence and STILL WON'T ACKNOWLEDGE UNIONS WHEN WORKING UNDER THEM? Holy shit, that's just evil. That's not stupid like a boomer or some tryhard trump supporter who clearly doesn't know anything. That's just evil.

Wikimedia definitely doesn’t need your money and hasn’t for years

[–] Darcranium@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Perfect timing. I just started donating to a new startup that seems as promising as Wikipedia once was. Nonprofit whose goal is to start their own universal basic income for users who don't want to wait for the government to start one. Now I can cancel my Wikipedia donations and not feel so bad

[–] Identikit@leminal.space 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, tell us who this is so we can support the real ones!

[–] Darcranium@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Haha ok ok my bad it's called comingle and i think it's still in beta phase for another month...

https://www.comingle.us/

[–] Batmorous@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Same, drop the details comment op!

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 33 points 1 day ago

Yet more evidence for my “never trust a self described libertarian” stance. Hasn’t failed me yet.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Might as well mirror the whole site, run it elsewhere where the suits don't have control over people.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I have an old 2023 copy of Wikipedia saved to my NAS using kiwix. This is probably the most recent version I'll ever need. But yeah, it's long overdue for some healthy competition, conflicts have been brewing for over a decade at this point.

[–] Batmorous@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Lots of things could do with more competition more than ever

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is probably the most recent version I’ll ever need.

Assuming nothing historically significant happens after that download, sure.

I've got an ancient encyclopedia from the 1950s that my dad owned. Let me tell you how useful that's been over the years.

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When I was a kid in the 80's, my sister and I found an old World Book Encyclopedia from the 50's that someone in our neighborhood was throwing out, so we brought it home. It had some interesting "facts" in it. E.g., did you know that guinea pigs are perfect as subjects for scientific research because they're unable to feel pain? 1950's worldbook did!

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

That's the cool thing about knowledge. We learn new things all the time. 70 years from now, things we think are true today will be laughed at as ignorant and naive.

Like an old Sears catalogs, old encyclopedias are fun snap shots into the past and worth the read.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Uhhhh there is no way that is true

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

I mean, I don't have the encyclopedia anymore, so I guess I can't really prove it to you. But it was sort of my introduction to the idea that not everything in an encyclopedia is necessarily true, so it's pretty memorable for me. I recognize the irony of using another encyclopedia here, but Wikipedia mentions in the History section of its Pain in Animals article, "Researchers remained unsure into the 1980s as to whether animals experience pain." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pain_in_animals#History ) I obviously don't know the story about how the line ended up in World Book, but I know they employ fact checkers for every line in the book, so presumably in the 50's the line reflected some kind of scientific consensus, as bizarre as that sounds now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Auth@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Whats going on here? I read wikimedia's statement and they seem open to staff unionizing if the majority vote to be represented by CWA. Why are they hiring union busting lawyers?

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cancelled my monthly. I'll start it again when I receive info that the workers have a union.

[–] Widukin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

Did the same.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 98 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (18 children)

This is bad.

…But I’m very worried about the future of Wikipedia.

Questionable leadership or not, it is a lighthouse in the information dystopia of the 2020s, which literally helps hold society together.

The far right wants it gone, and are not shy about screaming it, because Wikipedia is not compatible with fascism.

If it becomes hated by the left too, and ignored by the masses because of Big Tech blacklists it, I worry it won’t have the political support to keep its prominence.


And to be clear, I’m not worried about it dying. Wikipedia will stay where it is for decades.

I’m worried about it ceasing to be popular.

It doesn’t function as a uncontrolled source of information if no one sees it. Modern fascist censorship works by simply shifting attention.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

The Wikimedia foundation vastly outpaces expenses. Despite doing their best to convince you if you don't donate $10 right now Wikipedia will literally evaporate 🥺🙏

They can afford to not pay like shit

They're also wasting massive amounts of money on things outside their core mission and scope.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago

Then they need to drop the losers behind this anti-union BS. This isn't a complicated problem. If they're against working people they don't deserve political support. Anyone who cares enough can rip the site and rehost it elsewhere anyway or preferably multiple elsewheres so we don't run into this issue again.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (10 children)

We should probably all be downloading the website and printing off the important stuff, like how to make fire and why the sky-spirits get mad sometimes.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't understand this, the employees are few and the pr fallout + fighting this is much more expensive than just agreeing to what they demand

Plus it's a foundation and shouldn't have profit

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

the employees are few

WMF has 650 employees.

What they're going to demand is preventing arbitrary layoffs, less bullying in the workspace, etc. Supposedly the Foundation is very toxic workplace. It's not (just) about the money.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I only donate from time to time but people who cancel recurring donations should write to them the reason as to why.

[–] sunnyjim@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 minutes ago

I responded to their email asking for donations explaining why I won't be donating this year. I usually donate a small amount each year but I won't be until they change their mind.

I hate this. I really hate this.

[–] late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net 43 points 2 days ago

Wikimedia please fire whatever consulting firm told you it's a good idea to do extractive capitalism as a non-profit foundation, reliant on long-term community goodwill and sustainable work ethics with low turnover rate

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 293 points 2 days ago (9 children)
[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 117 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

I've never even considered donating since I learned they have reserve that can cover site upkeep for decades, and the way Jimbo Wales spends the money. And this is like, more than a decade ago.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I was initially 80/20 against/for Wikipedia's stance. I tentatively agreed with Wales' criticism of identity tracking for the initial vote, but needed more information to form a solid opinion. Then I saw the mention of their hiring a union busting firm in addition to their current relationship with a known union busting law firm.

Fuck them, 100%. I immediately cancelled my ongoing monthly donation, which I've provided for years. Until the Wikimedia Foundation recognizes their unionized employees and works with them in good faith, they will get not a penny from me

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grepe@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

the startups and nonprofits alike peak when it's the people who do the actual work that create them to solve the actual problems yhey have and they fall when a bunch of mba's take over to "make money"...

[–] LazyBaby@lemmy.zip 56 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I never would have heard about this if not for the fediverse

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Was wondering when they were going to enshittify.

Fuck you, Dimmy.

EDIT: just realized something. I listen to Cory Doctorow's podcast and he starts each episode off with a lengthy list of scheduled appearances. He's been mentioning an upcoming appearance with Jimmy Wales. Looked it up. They'll be on the same stage on August 17th. Wonder if this will come up.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 159 points 2 days ago (13 children)

I instantly regret every donation I've made to Wikipedia, and won't be making more in the future.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 82 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

God dammit, this is like the moment the Titanic first hit the iceberg. No matter how this labor issue is resolved, it will permanently demonize Wikimedia. No matter how valuable Wikipedia is or has ever been, current culture provides no foregiveness or path of redemption after an ethical transgression. Again, dammit, I love Wikipedia and have been donating steadily for years.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] shirro@aussie.zone 33 points 2 days ago

If your so called free society has laws to protect child murderers and racists but nothing to support the right to join a labour union it's not a free society. Go back to the beginning and try again.

load more comments
view more: next ›