this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
418 points (96.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41209 readers
3797 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CannedCairn@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

I am this old.

[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Wow, stereo TV, fancy.

The red one is for dangling.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Is that old? I still have devices using tulp. Modern day mixers and CDJ's still use tulp connections, as do proper amps.

I'm this old:

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Yours needed a dongle to connect to the serial port?!

And what the hell is that thing between the left and right buttons?

[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 2 points 7 hours ago

"not THAT kind of PS2..."

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I'm literally watching a baseball game with the right picture in the back of my second monitor, and it's plugged into an adapter for the left picture in my PC.

I'm 39.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 9 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

It's wild that we absolutely needed 2 cables for Audio but that one ought to do for Video.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago

It makes perfect sense since it is analog, each of them provides signal to a separate device. You had one screen and two speakers.

[–] vic_rattlehead@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know, I kinda like that it's 1 cable per device. Definitely easier to troubleshoot audio if a cable is disconnected, versus trying to figure out why my TV isn't passing HDMI 5.1 through the fiber audio output to a wireless transmitter to all the speakers! But maybe I'm old school too...

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Well the good news with Fiber is you can literally see if it's passing data. Can't see electrons.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 2 points 7 hours ago

No, but sometimes you can taste them.

Please do not try to taste the electrons.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You joke but the next evolution up was literally Red Green Blue for the 3 colors to make up an image

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

That (RCA component) was fucking stupid.

Why 3 connectors when no consumer ever mixes color channels? (mixing between sources requires external sync, which is only on pro gear and an extra cable anyway)
Why did they not decide between YPbPr and RGB before writing the standard?

Should have just adopted SCART (European connector for bidirectional A/V, RGBA and kind of CEC), dammit

[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

I continue to be shocked to discover things that seemed very recent to me are now a decade or two old. I probably shouldn’t be, but here I am.

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Yeah? Those were on the ps2

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Does this answer your question?

Also I don't think composite is that old tbf.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Ooh, I get to trot out my console humblebragging picture again.

[–] mobyduck648@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

A pain in the arse to drive from modern video sources is what it is! Bought a CRT recently with a thought to using it as a cool secondary monitor but HDMI to composite adaptors are all crap!

What I ended up doing was using HDMI to VGA, then VGA to composite. This let me set a proper 4:3 resolution and the picture improved a lot. What I should have done is not bother with composite at all and gone VGA to RGB to SCART as this would improve the colour a lot, but couldn’t find the adaptors for that. Not sure how widespread SCART was, might have only been a European thing but when I was a kid most TVs could either take a composite RCA input or SCART, and SCART could carry composite or RGB.

Definitely given me the bug for old TVs though, I’m going to have to write an ActivityPub to Teletext software adaptor so I can have Lemmy on a ‘90s TV or something. HackTV looks like a lot of fun as well.

[–] ThrowawayInTheYear23@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Created in 1954–1956 in wiki is correct

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

"created" and "in mainstream use" are two different things.. composite video has been around for a very long time, but composite video on consumer electronics really only started to get popular maybe starting in the late-80's. I worked at a Radio Shack in the early 00's and was still explaining to people how to use it because their old VCR only had coax and they used it on channel 3 or 4. The fact that "just match the colours" was so confusing to these people was ... well... yeah.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

still have some in a bag in my scrap catcher drawer

[–] stefenauris@pawb.social 2 points 13 hours ago
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 21 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I must be too young, I grew up on this:

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (4 children)

SCART was ahead of its time. You could control connected devices with it like HDMI CEC. You could wake up devices through it. You could daisy chain devices together with it. A TV could sent its TV signal down to a SCART connected device from its tuner! No equivalent for this exists today, unless there's TV that do HDMI OUT! By the end, it could do 1080p!

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Also, the TV didn't just send the currently-tuned channel 'down' the chain, it also allowed connected devices to inject their own, synced, video back into the TV, so you could be watching a show on BBC1, say, and the VCR could overlay a box in the top-right corner letting you know it had started a scheduled recording off Channel 4. Or, if you used a device like a Selectavision, if you tuned into a scrambled channel the Selectavision would notice, decode it, and send the descrambled version back up to the TV, all without the user realising it. Those clever Frenchies.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Yes, SCART's features are fucking clever but it got unwieldy thick because by the spec, each cable had to be separately shielded. Even the widescreen control signal that's mostly DC. Why not use differential pairs to reduce thickness and cost, modulate the audio and control signals together for fewer wires, and add a 5V rail to accomodate little demodulating converters (if you want separate audio devices) and eventually power PVR/tuner dongles? Most people use TV speakers anyway, that's the whole point of a single connector of an A/V standard. Not to mention how easily it fell out, almost every other connector holds better, and the ports are hard to feel on the back of the TV. If it's a giant 32" one nearly flush against a wall, good luck lining it up whenever you yank a controller cord and the vibration makes it fall off! And while a small STB can hang off RCA jacks, SCART sometimes disconnects by the weight of the cable itself. Or it gets angled so the video passthrough stops working and you only find later your VCR recorded just audio.

I think it's because of these problems, the biggest one emerged: SCART never became a worldwide standard. Nowadays, TVs are made for a world market, so even North America finally enjoys PAL-compatible sets (while most Europe-market ones and many VCRs were 3-standard since 1990), but unfortunately SCART is basically gone, not to mention very few capture cards were made with real RGB input because RCA component is stupid (why 3 connectors when no consumer ever mixes color channels? (mixing requires external sync, which is only on pro equipment and an extra cable anyway) why not decide between YPbPr and RGB before writing the standard?)

clever Frenchies

Don't say that. SCART is awesome despite its flaws but the same people also cursed half of Europe with fucking SECAM. Imagine needing a 64µs, 5MHz-bandwidth delay line just to decode color at all (unlike NTSC/PAL's QAM, SECAM's FM allows just a single chroma channel per line, alternatingly carrying U and V axes), and a frequency-modulation+pre-emphasis system in every console/camera/DVD player to encode it, plus no color killer option (disabling the colorburst) for sharp B/W like on the Apple II!

In PAL, information between subsequent lines was used too but only to correct recovered carrier phase between colorbursts, which was optional (cheaper sets kept NTSC-style hue controls) and could be handled by a locked oscillator rather than a whole-ass delay line (before shift registers (digital sequential-access-memory), every color set had fucking piezo transducers and physical waves travelling through precisely cut quartz, WTF?!).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

I'm this old - old TV, new for the time console

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)
[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 12 hours ago

I can hear this picture

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] shortypig@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago

Just used one a couple days ago.

[–] lemmy_at_em@lemmy.world 86 points 1 day ago (15 children)
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago

Jeez. You old! Damn, me too. Nowadays such a device would be 79,99 ans surely sold separately. Without cables of course.

As far as I remember that thing came with the 2600, no?

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›