this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
252 points (99.2% liked)

Funny

15789 readers
1020 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] violentfart@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Long ago I learned in an economics class that business is all about exploitation of underprivileged populations. From indigenous people to slaves to poor citizens to “third-world” countries.

Corporations are running out of people to exploit globally, so the idea of infinite artificial labor is the holy grail of cost optimization.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

and what will likely happen is when they finally develop it, suddenly that thing deserves to not be exploited.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 1 points 39 minutes ago

Nah. I haven't seen a convincing argument that gen AI is going to coalesce from this shit show.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 23 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Their desire for quick riches may just turn the masses against them. Maybe.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 14 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not even sure this is about the desire for quick riches.

If AI and human labor cost exactly the same, I bet most CEOs would still want to fire everyone and replace them with AI. Because they prefer the sycophantic AI over humans who might sometimes talk back and disagree ... or worse, try to form a union. And add to that just some pig-headed enjoyment of cruelty.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Of course, ai doesn't require healthcare, sick days, paid vacation, raises, maternity/paternity leave.

*The usa sucks

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 30 minutes ago

The total cost of AI might be the same as employee salaries and benefits. That’s the whole issue.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 2 points 2 hours ago

"The proles keep telling me that my brilliant ideas aren't technically feasible!"

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

"The people are revolting" takes on a new meaning every time somebody's net worth gains a comma.

[–] thenoirwolfess@fedinsfw.app 1 points 43 minutes ago* (last edited 43 minutes ago)

Feels like now, "The people are revolting" will only ever be the title of a tabloid opinion piece on the comments of two Redditors and maybe a tweet