this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
303 points (99.0% liked)

Funny

15789 readers
1026 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] notnowimbatin@fedinsfw.app 3 points 58 minutes ago

What do you mean I can't do a wage theft????

[–] violentfart@lemmy.world 19 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Long ago I learned in an economics class that business is all about exploitation of underprivileged populations. From indigenous people to slaves to poor citizens to “third-world” countries.

Corporations are running out of people to exploit globally, so the idea of infinite artificial labor is the holy grail of cost optimization.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

and what will likely happen is when they finally develop it, suddenly that thing deserves to not be exploited.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Nah. I haven't seen a convincing argument that gen AI is going to coalesce from this shit show.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago)

never said it would. I'm asserting that by the time AI gets to the point where its as useful as humans, it'll inherently be as deserving of autonomy and freedom as we are. which brings you back to being required to pay a living wage.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 28 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Their desire for quick riches may just turn the masses against them. Maybe.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 18 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not even sure this is about the desire for quick riches.

If AI and human labor cost exactly the same, I bet most CEOs would still want to fire everyone and replace them with AI. Because they prefer the sycophantic AI over humans who might sometimes talk back and disagree ... or worse, try to form a union. And add to that just some pig-headed enjoyment of cruelty.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Of course, ai doesn't require healthcare, sick days, paid vacation, raises, maternity/paternity leave.

*The usa sucks

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

The total cost of AI might be the same as employee salaries and benefits. That’s the whole issue.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 3 points 3 hours ago

"The proles keep telling me that my brilliant ideas aren't technically feasible!"

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"The people are revolting" takes on a new meaning every time somebody's net worth gains a comma.

[–] thenoirwolfess@fedinsfw.app 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Feels like now, "The people are revolting" will only ever be the title of a tabloid opinion piece on the comments of two Redditors and maybe a tweet