this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
322 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

86879 readers
3698 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Nano banana!

[–] antiphon@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I mean, it does seem fun. I don't want to turn it off. But maybe insert a hash into the image that makes it clear it's fake

[–] khanh@lemmy.zip 7 points 15 hours ago

wow...! people is using a feature that allows you to modify the appearance of a location anywhere on earth to add craters to places!! truly an unforseeable tragedy.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 26 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Don't even understand what this AI feature was even supposed to be for. I'm certainly not going to rely on an AI to annotate satellite imagery. This was always just a stupid marketing thing with no real purpose behind it.

For all of Google's faults, which of course are numerous, they do have some really talented engineers working for them, and it's just a shame that their time is constantly wasted on crap like this rather than on useful features that people would actually benefit from.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It’s to further the assault on truth.

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 3 points 15 hours ago

This is the answer.

[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

It will be used to hide more zorro ranches and islands. It will also show areas that look nice, but will be leveled like Gaza

[–] lechatron@lemmy.today 105 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I wonder what's stopping someone from just making a screen grab of a Google Maps satellite view and feeding it to one of the many AI image generators.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Oh I'm certain it's still there for their use.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because of course. Who could have seen that coming before they added it

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What on Earth was every the intended use of this feature? I just can't think of any way to use it other than vandalism and misinformation.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 20 points 1 day ago

It's intended use was misinformation but perhaps not in the way you imagine.

Rather than producing credible images, these sorts of projects undermine actual credible images.

For example, if you're team zion, then when shown images of how devastating Israel's attack on Gaza has been you can just disregard them as "probably fake".

"Oh pish posh, a child can create these images on google maps".

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would've asked it to turn my city into a Warhammer 40k battlefield.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

So Detroit?

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Google wanted its satellite images to help unleash users’ imaginations, like visualizing what an empty lot could look like, or seeing what their neighborhood looked like 100 years ago, or what it could look like 100 years from now.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago

I don't necessarily buy their press release as their actual designed use case.

[–] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I remember doing something similar for a highschool History class -- learning about local rivers, riparian corridors, the ancient California valley lake, and our soil types (why and are what they are). All things to draw up a more accurate picture. No way Google would utilize any of that knowledge. If I was a kid today, with that tool.. definitely F- homework for sure.

All imagination, no accuracy.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 5 points 17 hours ago

All ~~imagination~~ random guess work, no accuracy.

[–] opus86@lemmy.today 20 points 1 day ago

It might have been that plan all along, but now you can't tell someone to just google it. You can't believe google results anymore.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Google is run ~~my~~ by assholes and idiots. Break it apart.

Edit: fixed silly typo

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago

This is old news; backlash was immediate and the "feature" was rescinded.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those are balls.

This close, they always look like landscape. But nope, you're looking at balls.

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Are those balls? 'Cause the last time we were here, they were balls.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Eh, this one's fixable, because you only have a few sources of legit imagery, and it's all contemporary and digital. Just have Google Earth render the image server-side and add a cryptographic signature to any legit satellite images that someone saves.

You can have AI-generated satellite imagery and image-is-proof satellite images coexisting. Can't do that for most images, but for this particular niche, you can.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 3 points 1 day ago

Nobody is gonna do all that.