this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
423 points (97.7% liked)

politics

30667 readers
2601 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works 155 points 19 hours ago (31 children)

My voting flow chart is socialists, then democrats, then nobody.

Imo, we can fight over what shade of blue after the pedos are out of office.

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 61 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

This right here. And it goes for centrist dems too. If a progressive is the candidate on the ticket, vote for them. Don't let the pedophiles win this one

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 15 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yes. The centrist ass dem I voted for veto'd a pro union bill. I would still vote for her over the alternative.

My primary votes are all left though.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 24 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Seems notable that we don't have a headline with Joe Biden or whoever urging moderates to vote Democratic

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 20 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

And this is consistent with how Bernie has voted over the years. If his vote doesn't matter on a bill that will move things towards his goals but not enough, he votes no. However, if his vote is needed, he'll vote yes because some progress is better than no progress.

And it is always amazing how people will claim to like Bernie but really don't like it when this is pointed out.

[–] MJKee9@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (9 children)

Perfection is the enemy of the good. I understand that. I am also empathetic to the choice of those who sit out elections when they feel ignored. I don't agree with it, but i understand.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] protist@retrofed.com 59 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

If Democrats don't take at least one chamber of Congress in the fall, I genuinely worry they may never again. The little that's left of American democracy won't survive another 2 years of full MAGA control. Anyone urging you to not vote for the Democrat in your races or to not vote at all is either running a right-wing/foreign influence campaign or so clueless about the big picture as to be safely ignored.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 23 points 18 hours ago (11 children)

It totally depends on the candidate, their platform and who is financing their campaign. Just voting for someone because theyre a democrat gives us people like Kristen Sinema, Joe Manchin and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez who end up voting with the fascists.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 28 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

Fetterman, Manchin, and Sinema, bad as they are and were, were still the better choice compared to their general election opponents.

An occasional collaborator sucks,. but is less-bad than either an unrepentant facist or an aligned "moderate" like Collins.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 32 points 17 hours ago

I feel like people forget that the alternative to Fetterman was Dr Oz.

Swapping Fetterman for Oz would have given the GOP majorities in both House and Senate, put Mitch McConnell back as Senate President, and generally been an objectively worse outcome.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 16 points 18 hours ago

It totally depends on the candidate ...

That's what the primaries are for. Hope you have or will vote in yours this year.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (11 children)

Might as well pin this. Going to need this until November.

Just your friendly reminder that online right-wing operatives have a strong inclination to sow defeatism and apathy and push people to vote third party when it's abundantly clear that there won't be a race anywhere in the country where the Democrat isn't better than the Republican in a binary choice election. Clearly, Bernie agrees.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›