this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
302 points (99.3% liked)

politics

30667 readers
2680 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Abdul got 15899 votes in Dearborn in this primary election.

Kamala Harris got 15189 votes in Dearborn during the general presidential election.

I think that is a meaningful statistic.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Hard to tell much of anything considering this is a primary vs a full blow presidential election but who knows.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's entirely the point. Primaries, especially in non-presidential election years, are notorious for extremely low voter turnout.

The candidate in this senate primary pulled more votes than the nominee in a presidential general election.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago

That simply shows that this was a hotly contacted primary that drew out voters in Deerborn, okay no real argument from here, I agree but what else are you trying to point out with this isolated statistic?

I mean okay, 2024 primary had a 24 percent turn out rate and the general had a 75 percent turnout rate while this 2026 primary had a 27 percent turn out rate overall.

All of this doesn't tell me much outside of the this we've both said other than maybe we'd expect a mild uptick in voter turnout in the general.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 4 points 2 hours ago

Abdul for president?

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I mean, lots of consequential wins were by slim margins, this should be celebrated even if it wasn’t a landslide

After two decades of donating and volunteering for progressives, hell yes this should be celebrated.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 36 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It wasn't a blowout if you forget to look at how much money AIPAC spent.

[–] Kayday@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

$70 million, if I remember correctly

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I believe they spent $35 million on Haley Stevens, and her campaign spend $70 million total

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 hours ago

And it's a primary.

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 39 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Michigan Dems will vote blue no matter who, we had a primary we know outlr canidates and now we unite going forward.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 27 points 5 hours ago (40 children)

One can only hope; centrists tend to be pretty flaky.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 hours ago

Exactly. Centrist may choose not to vote.

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] notsure@fedia.io 19 points 6 hours ago

This man has policy ideas that are good. Policy over party, yet cool he's gonna caucus with the less crappy party.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 23 points 7 hours ago (14 children)

Yeah, blue no matter who right you bunch of worthless, hypocritical assholes?

I'm stuck having to vote for Katie Hobbs who's supposedly running with a god damn Republican so you assholes better man the fuck up too.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I mean some of us who said that actually meant it. Despite all of the wailing, tactical voting remains the correct way to participate in first past the post elections, even for leftists.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

El-Sayed specifically said that he is not a socialist, so I don't see why he'd fail to see full support for the general election. People confuse opposition to a specific label (a label with a great deal of negative baggage) with opposition to a specific set of policies.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›