this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
399 points (99.8% liked)

politics

30907 readers
1885 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnotherWastedHuman@retrolemmy.com 69 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Duh! All the recent losses to Progressives finally clue you in?!?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 43 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Raises the question as to why human decency is considered progressive….

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Aha! Excellent question! The reason why human decency is considered evil is very simple.

When Jesus escaped the cross and purged everyone who tried to kill him at Golgotha, he explained that forgiveness, mercy, and humility are weaknesses of the human condition. If you feel someone has crossed you, then you are obligated by the LORD to get revenge, or you would be committing the mortal sin of mercy.

Observe Figure A down below. The evil ones who perverted Christ's message favor the straight cross, since they believe that he actually wanted humans to be humble, forgiving, and weak. The true followers use this bent ends variant, which demonstrates how Christ changed his mind after the Romans failed to kill him.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Is this a shitpost? I can't find any evidence of any of this. Is this like some fringe version of Christianity like the Rosicrucians or something?

I feel like I'm missing a joke.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There’s a massive silent /s at the end of that. It’s pointing out how warped conservative culture Christian ideology is, that they’re preaching the exact opposite of what Jesus actually taught, under a nazi symbol.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly what I was going for.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you lol Its really hard to distinguish that especially on something like Lemmy because so many people will actually believe and post about the most insane shit and be 100% sincere about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

As far as this position on the issues, I'm pretty sure this was already a majority opinion anyway?

That kind of thing - polling on issues that actually fucking matter to everyone - is exactly why the Republicans work so hard to try to paint the Democratic Party as trying to make everyone transgender and have men competing in every single K-12 female sports event....

Suddenly we are arguing over "bathroom bills" and "men in women's sports" instead of about things on which there is majority support, but which the oligarchs oppose.

They distract with the culture war to divert attention from class warfare.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago

men competing in every single K-12 female sports event

I kind of do want this, though? Like, not every event, but every once in a while let's have a soccer match of a team of 6 year old girls versus a couple of middle-aged men. Just to see what happens.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Hey, if Musk can make "everything computer" why can't I make everything transgender?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Dem voters have been to the left of Dem leadership for at least a couple of decades now. But the big corporate donors don't want policies that help people. They want neocon subjugation.

[–] MJKee9@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This fact is now recognized by a majority of democratic voters, for the first time in my life.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

And therein lies my hope.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Of COURSE! We MUST try to get MAGA Votes if we Want to WIN!

-Democrat Strategists!

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I see you've been taking to Katie Hobbs!

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't worry, theres still plenty of time for the democratic party/DNC to fuck everything up in favor of the republicans-from-40-years-ago democrats.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

republicans-from-40-years-ago

You're off by a factor 10.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 17 points 2 weeks ago

THESE are the Things that Democrat Voters WANT and will WILLINGLY vote for? Well I GUESS we have NO Choice but to TRY and Court MAGA votes!

-James Carville!

It should just be the progressive party. I'm so done with the bullshit that changes nothing of the status quo that everyone is unhappy with.

This is the best time for it to be implemented. The next president will have the biggest opportunity to make huge sweeping disruptive changes. I just don't think the democrats have the balls to force it like they will be able to with the sweep.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

Prosecuting the facsists and making sure this crap can't happen again is essential. Focus on that motherfuckers.

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I am sure they just mean democratic voters not actual democratic candidates.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Democratic candidates will campaign on retaking both houses and then promise to work across the aisle for common sense tax reform.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Our oligarchs still largely fund politicians, so our politicians naturally tend to favour the belief system of their funding.

[–] taj@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

In other news, the sky is blue and water is wet!!

[–] Volkditty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Essential as a policy or essential as a campaigning slogan?

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait are they seriously listening finally?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

No this is just the people saying it not leadership saying/part of the dems platform

Because nothing could be more objectively and obviously true

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah they see it, but the standard Democratic politician will not do shit about it. Vote for the Progressives.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

After 30+ years, Democrats are finally showing some recovery from the BS that was neoliberalism.

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can't access this site because of a Datadome block.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago

I'll give you the first paragraph of each section.

Introduction

Liberal Democrats now make up a clear majority of their party ​and view universal healthcare, greater abortion access and higher taxes on the rich as essential political positions, underscoring how Democrats have moved ‌leftward in recent years, according to a new Reuters/Ipsos poll.

String of Victories

Insurgent left-wing candidates this year have racked up a string of ​primary victories over more centrist Democrats, many of whom were backed by the party establishment. They have gone beyond New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani's election last year in a deeply liberal city to vie for office in more politically divided states.

Divisions on Israel

Only ⁠16% of Democrats support military and economic support for Israel, while 57% oppose it, according to the Reuters/Ipsos poll. Among liberal Democrats, more than 80% said reducing or eliminating that support was either important or essential for any liberal; only 18% ​said it was not important.

And this is the poll of interest:

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's a cold war between the rich and the middle class (the poor are already casualties). You can't negotiate a truce with them because they're winning. It's way passed time to fight back so if we keep pulling our punches we'll end up in a prison planet.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

The polls have been consistently showing progressive policies have been popular for quite a while. It’s the party that wasn’t going along with the wishes of voters.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

While I'm in favor of increasing taxes on the rich if given the option, it's always felt like such a bandaid measure. Our society should be structured in a way that doesn't produce these people in the first place.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah but taxing the hell out of them helps with lowering production of them. The highest bracket tax rates used to be >90%

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm aware of this. The problem I have is that it basically means they are subsidizing large segments of our economy, making us more dependent on them. More dependence gives them more leverage, and eventually only continues this back and forth we have now.

I still support it, as I said previously. But it's never going to solve the root problems, which are executives and corporations as institutions. They need to be supplanted.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›