this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
57 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

86922 readers
3152 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 31 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What we want is software that behaves predictably. Since LLMs don't do that, we don't want them or their "agents."

For fuck's sake.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

To be clear, "normal" people are using LLMs like crazy. This I believe is specifically talking about is installed local agents. Boomers and non tech industry suits are using LLMs left and right and won't shut up about them.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 minutes ago

lol it's true. My mom sends me screenshots of AI chats every fucking day.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 6 points 1 hour ago

99% nudify apps

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I have agents force fed to me at work. I’ve already got my own honed workflows I’ve refined over the years; now, Outlook and Teams and Various agentic frameworks are spamming me with summaries of stuff I either already know or don’t need to know… except they still get it wrong constantly, so I can’t trust what they think I should prioritize (usually it’s work I’ve already assigned to others).

Claude Code agents are decent, but they need to create discrete work objects that can be properly reviewed, so act like junior coders.

The main issue I have with most agents today is that they try to replace MY work, making it more complicated and time consuming, instead of completing the work I can’t bother to do myself. And in order to do those things effectively, I have to loosen my privacy and security models to the point where they effectively don’t exist. Which I’d never do for another human, so why should I do it for an agent that’s more likely to catastrophically screw things up at record speed?

[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au 2 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago)

why

Uh, because its the future and if you don't you're not cool?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 47 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Not only do we not care about it, we actively hate it.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Are we considered "normal people" though?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 47 minutes ago

Here on social media we get to ensure that we only associate with other "normal" people. By our definition of "normal."

And then we get shocked when we discover that large numbers of people out there are not, in fact, "normal." Often when an election happens.

[–] runsmooth@kopitalk.net 1 points 20 minutes ago

I often wonder as well because being a news reader makes me assume others are also following the news more closely than myself. When I test this theory by talking to people around me, I learn that maybe I’m more alone than I thought.

At least with social media I get to follow the news with all of you, my fellow nerds