this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
498 points (96.1% liked)

memes

22308 readers
2854 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UntouchedWagons@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago

In my opinion 1920x1080 should be the baseline "standard definition" nowadays.

the bitrate of yt 720p sucks

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I remember when youtube basically only had one format and I'm pretty sure it was 240p lol.

[–] freudian_slop@programming.dev 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I still watch 360p on my phone lol.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Which is generally fine on such a small screen.

[–] Kratzkopf@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 days ago

Why is screen size important in this context? Sure, my TV is much bigger than my phone, but it is also multiple meters away. Considering the part those screens take up of my field of view, I'd say my phone is 'effectively bigger' than my TV.

[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 4 points 6 days ago

Technology advances, something is cutting edge, then the standard, then outdated.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 4 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Watching Naruto on a streaming website at 360p 4:3

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Literally never

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Do I remember? I'm fucking 60, I remember everything y'all ask about and much more. I remember when my 16" 1024 X 768 monitor died and I rushed to Staples before they closed to pay $400 for a 14" monitor, which was as much as I could afford at that moment. But, how far back do you want to go? MS-DOS 2.0 on a 12" amber monitor (I didn't like green)? I was there.

My current "big" TV is a 1920 X 1080 14-year-old 55" Toshiba dumb TV.

I got a 27" 4K monitor a few months ago, when my old monitor died. I have my second, old 1920 x 1080 monitor next to it. Yes, I can tell the difference, but only in text, not in video.

I wouldn't mind having a 100" OLED 4K TV, but for two things. I don't want to pay for it, but I would pay for it, except I'm afraid it would die in a couple of years, because my experience has been that new appliances are crap. So, I'll just stick with my old TV, and be happy that it's much better than my 27" Sharp CRT it replaced.

Now excuse me while I go look at new TVs.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

If its not sports or something where you're watching a tiny subject on the screen, there is no reason for more than 720p.

[–] HappyCatLuvs_U@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Pepperidge Farms about to start needing regular colonoscopies. 👀

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

1080p is now standard 4k is high definition Anything above 4k is overkill unless youre talking extremely large screens, bitrate, or VR applications

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago

But you need 4k so that you can see the peach fuzz on a female character to fuel an incel rant.

Also, if you didn't spend a months wages on a monitor and game at less than 60fps you might as well poke your eyes out.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›