this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
893 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

87390 readers
4543 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Amazon: "but but but! we have over 50,000 electric delivery vans, and we sent Capt Kirk to space!"

[–] dektep@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago
[–] Dustin03@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It is safe to say im done with amazon deleting my account now I will not support them anymore I worked there and saw how bad workers are treated and used to order stuff from them often im done with them period.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Waffelmeister@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (13 children)

Almost every day I have a fight with my gf over her Amazon account. I told her we can not proceed with a meaningful relationship if she doesn't cancel it. Am I the crazy one?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] errer@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

“Growth and sustainability don’t have to be in opposition — in fact, our results show they reinforce each other.”

Oh yeah, makes total sense guy.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

More context:

It would also be in stark defiance of Amazon’s stated climate goals, which center on reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2040.

That’s not lost on the tech giant. But as Amazon spokesperson Margaret Callahan told the NYT, the “world looks different now than when we co-founded the climate pledge.”

“We’re being transparent about the challenges, investing in innovation, and delivering measurable results,” Callahan continued. “Growth and sustainability don’t have to be in opposition — in fact, our results show they reinforce each other.”

That is so cynical.

The USA and its legislation (10 year moratorium on all AI regulation) is what changed.

The world is continuously and slowly going in the same direction since they "pledged". Nothing has changed there.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago

Ah but the never-ending deluge of Just Dance Vance videos is worth it!

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Holy Luigi!

We need Climate Action. How to nip this in the bud before they even start building the power plant. And not burning, or blowing up. That's bad for the world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Did they think what would happen if the gas price goes up and their profitability is completely dependent on that?

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Right? That's my thing, look at airlines and their Razer thin margins. They just built this megastructure and can't operate any of it without completely depending on gas prices.

Even without the green aspects no one stopped to think about the return on investment of layering the entire place in solar? 5 years from now? 20?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] plsnerf7@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

At this rate we are gonna have to mass clone Johnny's engram. 1 nuke is not enough. Wakeup

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Anything from futurism.com should be immediately questioned.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago

Sounds like an engineering nightmare

[–] ryphez@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Weren’t they supposed to be carbon neutral by 2030? Sure seems like they’re trending the wrong way

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›