this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
239 points (99.2% liked)

politics

30824 readers
2878 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President, who has decried mail-in ballots amid false claims of election fraud, issued March order to curb voting by mail

Donald Trump voted by mail in Florida’s Republican primary, Politico reports, citing Palm Beach county voting records. The White House has confirmed the president’s mail-in vote, according to the New York Times, which added that this is at least the third time the president has mailed his ballot.

In March, the president signed an executive ⁠order restricting the ​use of mail-in ballots ahead of the November midterm elections that will decide control of US Congress. Trump has repeatedly criticized mail-in voting, calling for restrictions on the policy for years and falsely claiming that his 2020 election defeat was the result of widespread voter fraud.

In a post on Truth Social on Monday, Trump continued his years-long false claims of election fraud in the United States – including by implying that mail-in voting is insecure.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] puzzleheadedegg1499@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 29 minutes ago) (2 children)

I might be out of the loop here, but how is it that he, a felon, can vote?

Or is it just like the other constitutional laws they don’t get too bogged down by?

[–] JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 hours ago

Florida law defers to the rules of the state they felony is in.

New York law is that felons can vote if they aren't in jail.

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

Felons can, and ethically should be able to, vote a lot of the time. Restricting voting rights is never a good idea. Supposedly Florida has a cool off period I cant be bothered to check, but i dont see an issue with this past extremely laughable hypocrisy

That said, i think his vote probably just says "I vote me, lol"

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It's OK I speak maga: he is at war with the sexually deranged woke left, and people serving in the military can vote by mail.

Don't hate me I just speak the language.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago

Nothing new about this. The hypocrite has been voting by mail since before his FIRST term.

[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 20 points 10 hours ago

wow. Donald Trump, a hypocrite?

[–] OberonSwanson@sh.itjust.works 32 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Are we supposed to be surprised? At this point we know he would trade his kids for McDonald’s, if he had to.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 6 points 9 hours ago

Not McDonald's the corporation, not even a single franchise.

He'd trade them for a Big Mac and medium fries.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Does anyone at the guardian genuinely believe that pointing out conservative hypocrisies does literally anything?

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 hours ago

It's a Sisyphian task, but it needs to be on the record so it can't be denied.

Unlike the Third Reich, the Trump Administration doesn't keep accurate records of their atrocities, so someone else has to. It didn't stop Hitler and it won't stop Trump, but the truth preserved prevents Holocaust deniers from convincing society at large, and we're going to need to remember the details when we're giving real teeth to the Constitutional limits on Presidential power, restructuring the checks and balances, and setting term limits on the Supremes.

[–] halezinflames@lemmus.org 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Trump being a hypocrite? Who would've guessed?

Fork found in kitchen, more at 11

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

In unrelated news, The sky is blue, water is wet and boobs are awesome

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

This fucking site

[–] halezinflames@lemmus.org -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

And cats are better than dogs

[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

you will not besmirch the name of the goodest boys in this corner of the internet, chucklenuts

I am willing to accept they are both better than people, however. Surely we can agree on that.

[–] halezinflames@lemmus.org 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

100%, I love dogs but I love cats more

[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yeah, fair enough.

a lot of words justifying my choice of petsdifferent strokes for different folks, my hand has been forced by an allergy to cats, and frankly, while I'm sure they're very sweet, I do not want to be the single, gay man with an animate ballsack for a cat (Yeah I know there are other hypoallergenic options but they were expensive last I checked and I'm poor -- and, so were sphinxes, but I might be misremembering that part). I still pet every cat I get the chance to, regardless of how miserable it makes me because of said allergy, but oh man I could not exist in a house that had them.

I also appreciate dogs inability to lie, more, too; it has been my experience that a cat can plot. Dogs have little capacity for thought-out planning, good or bad, and their tail usually gives it away; but a cat gets ideas and a cat that is plotting to shit in your shoes later, and a cat that is more or less indifferent to your existence, or a cat that merely doesn't want to engage with visitors, all look incredibly similar. Much like people, they can be duplicitous and incredibly good at it if they choose to be.

Now, you might appreciate that emotional complexity (and I admit, it does make dogs sound basic by comparison), but I do not. If a dog doesn't like you, you will know almost immediately, almost 100% of the time. They are the worst liars of the domesticated animal kingdom, from being ashamed or not about who pissed on the carpet to whether or not they want you petting them or like the way that you currently are, or if they just get an awful vibe from someone -- I can read them like a book, as someone with mild autism it's fantastic. People? People can fuck themselves. (present company excluded, I suppose, we are in one of the moderately less awful corners of the internet, and I'm guessing the ratio of neurotypicals to not here is somewhat skewed)

I've been around cats (my allergy only developed after a few years around them), and I know from experience they are... wired differently. They're better liars than dogs are, at least, when they want to be. I've met a few cats that obviously liked me, and a couple cats despise me, and just one that I know plotted. Whereas pretty much every dog I've ever met has at least tolerated me if not outright wanted to be my best friend.

[–] HappyCatLuvs_U@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like I am crazy. Did he not already get called on doing this before and then just said: "I need to because I'm President."

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Yeah he has voted through mail multiple times. Man's a hypocrite.

[–] lemmygarden@lemmy.today 3 points 9 hours ago

It would be a great photo-op for Trump to go vote in person. But he would have to be capable of walking from the car to the polling place. Or his ankles would have to be in the tightest compression socks so that they aren't swollen and concerning-looking. Lazy/easier to just stay home and tweet AI slop on his social media site.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So we should expect a strongly worded letter from the Dems in response? Right? Right?

[–] LdyMeow@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

Mmmm, best I can do is saying they wont bring Medicare for all up if they get majorities.