this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
1043 points (98.9% liked)

People Twitter

10346 readers
1477 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 20 hours ago

I feel like the right thing to do is show them a movie from the early to mid 80s that used early CG and then show them Legend from 1985 point at Darkness and be like "That's a dude in a suit. 5 and a half hours of makeup every day for him to look like that." Then pull out Clue and point at Wadsworth and be like "This is the same dude."

Then get a mop because you have to clean up after their heads explode.

[–] Michal@programming.dev 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not cooked, they just don't know.

I'm pretty sure I also wondered "holy crap is that guy really that big?" When I watched it

[–] whereitsat@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

i don't remember ever questioning his size. WWF and arnold were so popular that it was normal to see huge, roided out dudes in pop culture.

andre the giant was just slightly bigger.

[–] Boost@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

Arnold is 6'2" and was ~250 pounds in his peak body building days. Andre was 7'4" and ~500 pounds. There were lots of huge dudes at the time but Andre really was kind of in a league of his own.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 173 points 1 day ago (7 children)

You could also play with camera angles, but dimensionally, yeah, no substitute for a big dude.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 86 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Or a little dude to make a normal dude look big like in LotR.

[–] galacticbackhoe@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I thought a lot of their work was camera tricks. Jonathan Rhys-Davies was 6'3.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

They used every trick out there at some point. They even invented a new technique for 2 shots in Bag End where they had motion-controlled cameras, tables, and benches synched up so they could do the only ever forced-perspective shots with moving cameras ever really used.

Everything since then went digital in the following years, the technique was never really used again.

In the Hobbit films, they had to lean more into digital because they were in 3D, so forced perspective shots wouldn't work.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

See: Hagrid's behind-the-scenes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago

VFX artists react look at these things all the time:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Wf8NgICk3ng

Some really cool 90s tricks with forced perspective.

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is one of the reasons why I love love love cinema history. The lengths that the crew and creative team went to in order to make an illusion work is just mind-boggling. One of my favorite things to do as a kid was watch the DVD extras about Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, Labyrinth, all that.

One of my favorite forced perspective tricks ever was Darby O'Gill and the Little People. That old Irishman playing a fiddle above a cavern full of leprechauns, galloping around a pile of ancient treasure on tiny horses, and then rushing off to hunt foxes through a magical crack in the wall?

Literally, one of the most incredible feats of practical film illusion ever concocted, right up there with the velociraptors of Jurassic Park and the chest-burster from Alien.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 27 points 1 day ago

One time, Arnold and Andre went out for lunch.

When the check came, both men reached for it. Andre decided the issue by picking Arnold up and carrying him away.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Holy shit that’s Wilt Chamberlain??

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is!

To put this photo in perspective Wilt "The Stilt" was 7'1" and 250lbs (216 cm/113 kg). Andre was 7'4" and 520lbs (224 cm/236 kg). Almost twice Wilts overall size, just an absolutely massive unit of a human being.

They both make Arnolds impressive 6'2 & 210lb (190cm/95kg) seem relatively dwarf-like.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Now is where someone better at storytelling than me would talk about the time Andre the Giant drunkenly passed out in a hotel lobby and nobody could move him so they just left him there.

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Andre had a lot of joint problems related to his gigantism, as well as physical injuries from his wrestling career. He self-medicated with alcohol, and became addicted to it.

It was really sad.

[–] valkyre09@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hello sir, yes hi. I came for an amusing anecdote, but instead I was shown nothing but sadness and pity. I’d like a refund please.

[–] ContriteErudite@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sorry I am not authorized to give refunds, but I hope that the following Andre the Giant facts will help: he was widely known as the "Gentle Giant" because his real-life personality was exceptionally kind, friendly, and generous. He was soft-spoken and gentle around children, lifting them up and being patient so they wouldn't be scared. He disliked arrogance and mean-spirited people, and would physically "reprimand" bully coworkers in the ring.

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

He was a good guy. I'm ashamed to admit that I believed some lies about him for a long time.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Or the time he let out a fart for, like, 3 minutes straight and someone asked "Andre, are you okay?" to which he replied "I am now, boss."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I still struggle with how animators in 1937 were able animate the ripples in the water in Snow White at about 1:36.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They did it by hand. Frame by frame.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

It's an astonishing accomplishment, what with how realistic it looks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 21 hours ago

Does twitter-op not know about practical effects? I never watched the movie, but im gonna guess stuff like low filming angles, stools, plateau-shoes existed back then

[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To be fair, André was one especially Big McLargehuge beefy specimen of mountainous manmeat.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 69 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Mandy (Inigo) is 6 foot (1.83m), Wallace (Vizzini) is 5 foot 2 inches (1.57m)

[–] West_of_West@piefed.social 26 points 1 day ago (15 children)

I never realized Inigo was himself tall. Wild

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The irony is that he's actually not that tall. It was practical effects. Not digital.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's 7ft tall. Even being 6'3, my reaction to a 7ft tall person is, "Holy shit, that's one tall dude."

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's crazy being a tall(ish) person and seeing someone a full head/shoulder above you. If I notice a tall person they're tall.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 1 day ago

It's so rare to have to look up at someone. But I now understand how my wife feels

load more comments (1 replies)

The biggest dude of all. A giant!

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 72 points 1 day ago (4 children)

How does his parents knew he was going to be giant as a baby? Or it was just luck that he was named Andre the Giant, and grew up to be giant?

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Manifest destiny, you name a kid "the Giant" and they'll grow

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The Wizard of Speed and Time is a very interesting 2026 movie when you realize it was made in 1988 (or 1979, depending on which part) without computer animation. Someome asked how he filmed the train sequence, where he outran a train. His answer? "I just ran faster than the train was moving"

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why would they ask "how" they made him big? Wouldn't they simply assume the usual CGI or forced perspective? (I'm assuming here dad has sat them through all 286 hours of Lord of the Rings Making Ofs)

Edit: ah. see below.

[–] Secret_Music@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago (12 children)

I mean, it is a movie from the 1900s, so how did they do it?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean, they might be cooked but that seems like a reasonable question for a kid who doesn't know all the tricks and hasn't seen it before. This feels like "I'm going to bash the youth because I'm old" boomer humor

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao these idiot children don't understand the intricacies of filmmaking. Bet they don't know shit about 3-point lighting and ADR either. Stupid kids need to spend less time on the tick tocks and more time studying cinema!

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Stupid kids need to spend less time on the tick tocks and more time studying cinema!

Listen, until they've tried making their own full claymation stop motion to fully understand onion skinning and editing I don't want to see their faces at the dinner table

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Gonna ground my kids if they can't tell me the difference between diegetic and non-diegetic music

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 2 points 19 hours ago

And for summer reading there'll be no "Redwall" or "Goosebumps" or whatever, only "Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex-Drugs-and-Rock ’n’ Roll Generation Saved Hollywood" and the like

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›