this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
632 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

87597 readers
4652 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 153 points 6 days ago (24 children)

"Capitalism breeds innovation."

Also capitalism:

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 87 points 6 days ago

One of the biggest lie to keep the current system in place.

Private corporations parasite themselves into R&D paid for by the government and act like they invented the fire again.

The Internet is built on FOSS and got captured to be sold back to us.

Capitalism breeds innovation just like people leave their partner when they finally have enough to be abused.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 41 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Competition breeds innovation. Commercial pressure can be one source of such competition, but isn't the only one.

Capitalism abhors competition. It breeds innovation only if it serves to eliminate competition.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 days ago

Absolutely correct, Capitalism will incentivize innovation only as long as it's profitable to do so. Once a company becomes a dominant player in their industry, innovation actually becomes largely unprofitable.

We can see this play out all the time, this is why industry giants almost never try to outcompete smaller start ups by innovating their products and services, instead, they either crush them out of the market via a bunch of different methods. Or they just buy them out, kill off their IP, or if it's way better, they just brand it as their own, and usually fire most of the old staff.

In a Capitalist system, this actually creates a whole new incentive structure where start ups will try to grow as fast as possible with the sole intention of getting bought out by an industry titan, making the founders of the start up filthy rich.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 20 points 6 days ago

Capitalism breeds protectionism.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 96 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

That tracks.

The more I learn about American history the more frustrated I become with our species in general. Our country could be so much more livable now, but for a handful of vulgarly wealthy people who only ever cared about number going up at any cost.

And to make it worse I'm reading a biography of John D. Rockefeller, so I'm about to hate our species just a tiny bit more.

[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

While you're in that mood check the documentary Hypernormalization from BBC. Explains a lot.

And when it ends check the year it came our for extra oof.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago (5 children)

All of our lives could be so much better. We should stop making dystopian futuristic movies, and start making hopeful ones that help people imagine how much BETTER things could be.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 17 points 6 days ago

Solarpunk instead of Cyberpunk!

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yeah let me find 20 million dollars to make that movie

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago

It only costs like a few million, the rest is for embezzlement and fraud.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works 56 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It’s time for other countries to create their own operating systems again

Make other countries create other operating systems again

[–] markko@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We’ve been doing it for a long time. Linus is from Finland.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 16 points 6 days ago

Currently, Linux Foundation resides in the US, though.

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

what counts as an "operating system"? is it enough to just create another linux distro? is it enough to just fork the distro and add a new visual design to it?

[–] GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

(Sign) I just want other countries to create good operating systems again

I’m tired boss

[–] plyth@feddit.org 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Be honest, you just hope that the sheer amount of resources will lead to some country finally finish https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Hurd

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 26 points 6 days ago

Reminds me of Microsoft killing Nokia and their new Linux phones.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 32 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Was it because of this guy?

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (3 children)

replaced the tree-structured directory hierarchy with an arbitrary directed graph.

TBH that sounds like a total nightmare

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Yeah this OS would suck as soon as the 00s hit with the global Internet. This OS seems completely incompatible with how the world actually works and would probably collapse under its own design by the year 2010. A file is an arbitrary string of bytes. Removing the ability for the user to handle them like this is so obtuse. The reason why we can poke modern OSes the way we can is to prevent requiring a man-year of work every time we need a major new feature.

The idea was that every layer, from silicon to user interface, would be designed together, with no compatibility debt to existing platforms.

...which makes compatability debt between it and literally everything else.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NotSafeForWorld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I dunno, I kinda fw it. Like having a tag-based system for grouping files instead of nested folders does give me less anxiety in organizing everything, and it lessens the bloat due to duplicates

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago

Japan tried to walk where Terry Davis was running laps

[–] jama211@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (6 children)

I doubt it would've won anyway. There were loads of OS's at that time, most not having the issue of the US government intervening, and none of them won either.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›