this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Memes

57005 readers
546 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kaleidoscope@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Where can I go to read more about this?

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Also, John Smith - imperialism in the 21st century.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool, now do public education and public roads.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can have all of the above including education and public roads without ruthlessly exploiting the Global South by shifting to Socialism.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yet roads and lines of communication make a socialist transition more likely. Almost like the material conditions matter, regardless of the political context.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kinda? I don't really see what your point is. Material conditions absolutely matter, but it's also important to understand that the bribes paid to the proletariat in the Global North are comprehensively stolen from the Global South, and are why there hasn't been a revolution in the Global North but many in the Global South.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's important to understand that any argument against improving one's material conditions is going to be rightfully ignored. Better to point out that without removing the yoke of power, any concessions can be easily removed.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It isn't an argument against that, though. It's an argument that without Socialism and without anti-Imperialism, it heightens Imperialism and exploitation.